Hi Liming,
Next question
-
Status = CoreLocateDevicePath (&gEfiDevicePathProtocolGuid, &DevicePath,
&DeviceHandle);
if (!EFI_ERROR (Status) && (DeviceHandle != NULL) &&
IsDevicePathEnd(DevicePath)) {
Status = EFI_ALREADY_STARTED;
continue;
}
-
If
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 04:02:16PM -0700, Jordan Justen wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Anthony PERARD
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've been working on writing a driver to use a Xen PV disk directly from
> > OVMF. So far, I have a working prototype, a guest can boot from a PV
> > devic
I am a bit confused by one of the comment in
MdeModulePkg/Universal/Console/GraphicsConsoleDxe/GraphicsConsole.c.
The comment at line 480
(https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Consol
e/GraphicsConsoleDxe/GraphicsConsole.c#L480) is:
//
// if not
On Jun 4, 2014, at 8:27 AM, Olivier Martin wrote:
> I am a bit confused by one of the comment in
> MdeModulePkg/Universal/Console/GraphicsConsoleDxe/GraphicsConsole.c.
> The comment at line 480
> (https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Console/GraphicsConsoleDxe/G
Yes, I saw this requirement. But in this case why 800x600 and not 640x480?
Or even trying both?
If my platform supports 640x480 and not 800x600 and for some strange reason
it goes in this part of the code it would fail. Even if it is compliant with
the UEFI spec.
And actually it might even be a o
On Jun 4, 2014, at 9:49 AM, Olivier Martin wrote:
> Yes, I saw this requirement. But in this case why 800x600 and not 640x480? Or
> even trying both?
> If my platform supports 640x480 and not 800x600 and for some strange reason
> it goes in this part of the code it would fail. Even if it is co
I tend to agree for the PCDs.
My use case was I was debugging a third-party platform that was not
implementing the GOP protocol (Get/SetMode() functions) correctly. And for
some this reason the code path ends up in this condition.
In my opinion, this CheckModeSupported (800x600) should be removed
On Jun 4, 2014, at 10:35 AM, Olivier Martin wrote:
> I tend to agree for the PCDs.
> My use case was I was debugging a third-party platform that was not
> implementing the GOP protocol (Get/SetMode() functions) correctly. And for
> some this reason the code path ends up in this condition.
> In
