Hi Cameron,
BTW, please use debug build for Coreboot Payload, such that debug
information can be shown in serial console from the very early stage in the
Payload's execution. This would help validating the functioning of serial.
Thanks,
- ben
> -Original Message-
> From: edk2-devel
On 24 November 2017 at 17:04, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 02:20:48PM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> The only user of ArmPlatformLib's ArmGetCpuCountPerCluster () is itself
>> an ArmPlatformLib implementation, i.e., ArmVExpressLibRTSM.
>>
>> Given that
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 03:25:21PM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 25 November 2017 at 13:27, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> > AndroidBoot and AndroidFastboot (as well as their shared component
> > AndroidBootImgLib) have minor dependencies on BdsLib.
> >
> > First fix up a
> On Nov 25, 2017, at 4:56 AM, Udit Kumar wrote:
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Daniel Thompson [mailto:daniel.thomp...@linaro.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2017 1:42 AM
>> To: Ard Biesheuvel
>> Cc: Udit Kumar
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 07:46:18AM +0100, Marcin Wojtas wrote:
> MvFvbDxe driver introduces non-volatile EFI variable support
> for Armada platforms. It relies on memory-mapped SPI read access.
> Implementation of EFI_FIRMWARE_VOLUME_BLOCK2_PROTOCOL
> is done with using existing Marvell SPI
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 07:46:17AM +0100, Marcin Wojtas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I submit v2 of the Armada variable support with the style of
> the MvFvbDxe driver fixed and other minor modifications. Depex
> configuration was moved from 4/4 to previous patches. Details
> can be found in the changelog
Hi Kalyan,
This is a huge (and much appreciated) contribution.
However, in order to simplify reviewing, could you please:
1) Configure your edk2-platforms clone as described in
On 25 November 2017 at 13:27, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> AndroidBoot and AndroidFastboot (as well as their shared component
> AndroidBootImgLib) have minor dependencies on BdsLib.
>
> First fix up a missing mapping in EmbeddedPkg.dsc to let the modules
> build standalone.
Hi Cameron,
CorebootPayloadPkg does support serial output as user interface. To enable
serial, the CorebootPayloadPkg retrieves serial information from Coreboot
through CorebootModulePkg\Library\CbParseLib\CbParseLib.c =>
CbParseSerialInfo(), which is called by CorebootPayloadPkg\Library\
Hi Star,
Sorry to make a mistake with the code package :)
Please see my test results below.
在 11/24/2017 5:41 PM, Zeng, Star 写道:
Good problem statement.
EndGaugeEx and GetGaugeEx also need to be updated as they are operating same
memory buffer, otherwise the performance data may be messed
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 05:58:30PM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> This is mostly a preparatory series that will allow us to get rid of a lot
> of code that is specific to only a single ARM development platform out of
> the main EDK2 tree.
>
> First of all, it removes a couple of false
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 07:04:18PM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Ordinary computers typically have a physical switch or jumper on the
> board that allows non-volatile settings to be cleared. Let's implement
> the same using DIP switch #1 on block #3, and clear the EFI variable
> store if it is
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 07:04:17PM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> These are the remaining patches that still need review after the majority
> of the Socionext SynQuacer support patches were merged.
All remaining patches in series:
Reviewed-by: Leif Lindholm
> Changes
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Thompson [mailto:daniel.thomp...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2017 1:42 AM
> To: Ard Biesheuvel
> Cc: Udit Kumar ; Leif Lindholm
> ; edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Varun
Hi,
About 1.1), I agree with Jiewen’s suggestion. Besides it, we also need to
provide dummy function of InitializeCpuExceptionStackSwitchHandlers() in NULL
instance in MdeModulePkg/Library/CpuExceptionHandlerLibNull.
But we need to think about the return status carefully. For example, if
Required to build Android*Boot standalone.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm
---
EmbeddedPkg/EmbeddedPkg.dsc | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/EmbeddedPkg/EmbeddedPkg.dsc b/EmbeddedPkg/EmbeddedPkg.dsc
The sum use these applications made of BdsLib was one invocation of the
IS_DEVICE_PATH_NODE macro, and (incorrectly) being able to leave out a
dependency on gEfiLoadedImageProtocolGuid.
So expand the macro in place and add the missing dependency.
Then clean up the .dsc, .inf and #includes
AndroidBoot and AndroidFastboot (as well as their shared component
AndroidBootImgLib) have minor dependencies on BdsLib.
First fix up a missing mapping in EmbeddedPkg.dsc to let the modules
build standalone. Then get rid of the use of BdsLib.
Leif Lindholm (2):
EmbeddedPkg: add UefiRuntimeLib
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 11:37:10AM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> The only remnant of the deprecated ARM BDS in EDK2 is its BdsLib, which is
> depended upon by FdtPlatformDxe in EmbeddedPkg, which itself is something
> we'd prefer to get rid of. Since only TC2 and Juno actually use this driver,
>
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 11:45:03AM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Remove two pieces of legacy that are only used by platforms residing under
> Platform/ARM in edk2-platforms, and really shouldn't serve as examples for
> new contributions. So after migrating the code to edk2-platforms, remove it
>
Jian,
I reviewed your patches and sent my minimal comments in other separate mail.
They should not impact the functionality.
I am ok if you push the v2 patches now and do the updating based on my comments
in separate patches later.
Reviewed-by: Jeff Fan
Thanks!
Jeff
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 04:56:18PM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Remove everything from ArmPlatformPkg that is either unused, or so highly
> specific to development platforms manufactured by ARM Ltd. that they really
> don't belong in the main branch.
>
> Note that the migration involves patches
Thanks Andrew,
We have one ACPI PNP ID.
I am looking for better way to define ACPI tables. Say a driver (could be slave
or master) can work with PRP0001, (example flashes, i2c slaves)
then do we need to define HID for the same or not . With condition such driver
don’t expose or need some AML
> -Original Message-
> From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:ard.biesheu...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2017 1:10 AM
> To: Daniel Thompson
> Cc: Udit Kumar ; Leif Lindholm
> ; edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Varun
Hi,
I am not sure if this is good idea to define such arch specific definitions in
MdeModulePkg. Moreover, we don’t know how ARM or other processors define this
definition, either.
Jeff
From: edk2-devel on behalf of
Jian,
EFIAPI is not required for ArchSetupExcpetionStack().
Reviewed-by: Jeff Fan
Jeff
From: edk2-devel on behalf of Jian J Wang
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2017
I do not think it is a good idea to push it now.
I think we need more thought on API design especially for pei/smm in the
future. (My comment for 1.2/1.3/1.4)
thank you!
Yao, Jiewen
> 在 2017年11月25日,下午9:44,Fan Jeff 写道:
>
> Jian,
>
> I reviewed your patches and sent
27 matches
Mail list logo