On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:20:30AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 17 October 2016 at 09:33, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 08:28:50AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> > diff --git a/ArmVirtPkg/Library/ArmVirtGicArchLib/ArmVirtGicArchLib.c
> >> > b/ArmVirtPkg/Library/ArmVirtG
On 17 October 2016 at 09:33, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 08:28:50AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> > diff --git a/ArmVirtPkg/Library/ArmVirtGicArchLib/ArmVirtGicArchLib.c
>> > b/ArmVirtPkg/Library/ArmVirtGicArchLib/ArmVirtGicArchLib.c
>> > index 64afc4d..16683ef 100644
>> > --
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 08:28:50AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > diff --git a/ArmVirtPkg/Library/ArmVirtGicArchLib/ArmVirtGicArchLib.c
> > b/ArmVirtPkg/Library/ArmVirtGicArchLib/ArmVirtGicArchLib.c
> > index 64afc4d..16683ef 100644
> > --- a/ArmVirtPkg/Library/ArmVirtGicArchLib/ArmVirtGicArchLi
Hello Ard,
Thanks for the comments! I will split this patch into 2 and for ArmVirtPkg
patch,
we just need to simply drop the original ASSERT() since it's nonsensical any
more.
Thanks,
Dennis
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 08:28:50AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Hi Dennis,
>
> On 17 October 2016 at
Hi Dennis,
On 17 October 2016 at 06:03, Dennis Chen wrote:
> Since ACPI spec defines the GIC base addresses (CPU interface,
> Distributor and Redistributor*GICv3 only*) as 64-bit, so we
> should define these corresponding base address variables as 64-bit
> instead of 32-bit. This patch redefines
5 matches
Mail list logo