> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
> Jordan Justen
> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 11:03 AM
> On 2015-09-09 20:26:54, Andrew Fish wrote:
> > > On Sep 9, 2015, at 5:41 PM, Jordan Justen
> wrote:
> > > On 2015-09-09 16:05:20,
On 10/09/2015 16:24, Kevin Davis wrote:
> Further leading me to guess that any actual use of those
> implementations could lead to you actually needing to hire a real
> attorney and not one that you find on YouTube.
The good thing is that attorneys have already figured it out. IBM
figured out
On 09/09/15 18:17, Jordan Justen wrote:
> On 2015-09-09 01:57:51, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 08/10/15 18:24, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> Let's do an OVMF BoF at this year's KVM Forum too.
>>
>> Here's a preliminary task list, after some off-list discussion (I tried
>> to incorporate
> I don’t understand the issue BSD licensed code?
> It should be compatible with the GPL?
> The GPL code could merge bug fixes from the BSD
> source base as needed. It is just the BDS source
> base that can not take back GPL code.
I'm not sure I understand, I presume you understand all BSD/GPL
gt;> <ag...@suse.de>; qemu devel list <qemu-de...@nongnu.org>; Hannes Reinecke
>> <h...@suse.de>; Gabriel L. Somlo (GMail) <gso...@gmail.com>; Peter Jones
>> <pjo...@redhat.com>; Peter Batard <p...@akeo.ie>; Gerd Hoffmann
>> <kra..
On 2015-09-09 20:26:54, Andrew Fish wrote:
> > On Sep 9, 2015, at 5:41 PM, Jordan Justen wrote:
> > On 2015-09-09 16:05:20, Andrew Fish wrote:
> >> So you have a legal degree and are speaking on behalf of your
> >> employer on this subject?
> >
> > No and no. How about
> On Sep 9, 2015, at 9:17 AM, Jordan Justen wrote:
>
> On 2015-09-09 01:57:51, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 08/10/15 18:24, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> Let's do an OVMF BoF at this year's KVM Forum too.
>>
>> Here's a preliminary task list, after some off-list
Short term an OVMF-centric solution is good.
But long term, I think Linux needs a Linux-friendly IBV to build native
UEFI -- as well as OVMF-flavored UEFI -- with non-BSD licensed community
code. If you restrict this to just OVMF, any GPL innovations will only
happen at virtual level. Right now,
On 2015-09-09 10:04:50, Andrew Fish wrote:
>
> > On Sep 9, 2015, at 9:17 AM, Jordan Justen wrote:
> >
> > So, related to this, I wonder how the community would feel about a
> > GplDriverPkg. Would the community allow it as a new package in EDK II
> > directly, or
Bonzini [pbonz...@redhat.com];
xen-de...@lists.xen.org [xen-de...@lists.xen.org]; Laszlo Ersek
[ler...@redhat.com]; Ademar de Souza Reis Jr. [ar...@redhat.com]
Subject: RE: [edk2] EDK II & GPL - Re: OVMF BoF @ KVM Forum 2015
The recent expansions beyond BSD where all permissive licenses (BSD
10 matches
Mail list logo