Re: [edk2] Tianocore Community Update 2016 #1

2016-03-10 Thread Laszlo Ersek
On 03/10/16 18:20, Mangefeste, Tony wrote: > Very good thoughts, Laszlo. > > The more I think about GitHub integration, the more I'm leaning > against it. Another reason is that we can assign groups to certain > organizational emails to allow/grant special rights to specific > classes of issues.

Re: [edk2] Tianocore Community Update 2016 #1

2016-03-10 Thread Mangefeste, Tony
[mailto:ler...@redhat.com] Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 2:33 AM To: Mangefeste, Tony <tony.mangefe...@intel.com> Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org <edk2-de...@ml01.01.org> Subject: Re: [edk2] Tianocore Community Update 2016 #1 On 03/09/16 19:49, Mangefeste, Tony wrote: > I. Defect &

Re: [edk2] Tianocore Community Update 2016 #1

2016-03-10 Thread Laszlo Ersek
On 03/10/16 14:11, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Thu, 2016-03-10 at 13:58 +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> >>> Sure, actually getting vendor buy-in for that is a completely different >>> story. But let's not design the system to make it hard :) >> >> I couldn't buy in. > > That's fine. I'm not asking

Re: [edk2] Tianocore Community Update 2016 #1

2016-03-10 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2016-03-10 at 13:58 +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > > > Sure, actually getting vendor buy-in for that is a completely different > > story. But let's not design the system to make it hard :) > > I couldn't buy in. That's fine. I'm not asking you to. I'm just asking that we don't make it

Re: [edk2] Tianocore Community Update 2016 #1

2016-03-10 Thread Laszlo Ersek
On 03/10/16 11:58, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Thu, 2016-03-10 at 11:33 +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> >>> * Considering tying the Bugzilla login to GitHub using GitHub as the >>> provider. This would mean that anyone wishing to submit an item into >>> BZ would require a GitHub account. >> >> I

Re: [edk2] Tianocore Community Update 2016 #1

2016-03-10 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2016-03-10 at 11:33 +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > > > * Considering tying the Bugzilla login to GitHub using GitHub as the > > provider.  This would mean that anyone wishing to submit an item into > > BZ would require a GitHub account. > > I vote against this. I find 3rd party

Re: [edk2] Tianocore Community Update 2016 #1

2016-03-10 Thread Laszlo Ersek
On 03/09/16 19:49, Mangefeste, Tony wrote: > I. Defect & Issue Tracking > There are several topics we're investigating, and your input is appreciated: First of all, thank you very much for going forward with Bugzilla! > * Considering tying the Bugzilla login to GitHub using GitHub as the >