I don't understand why you people are making this so complicated; All he
needs to do is draw a Venn diagram
In sci.stat.consult Lloyd I. Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: of dummy variables for categorical variable model testing? Maybe it was
: Kelly, Beggs & McNeil that first suggested this technique.
actually it was R.A. Fisher thru use of orthogonal polynomials
>From Burrill and Ulrich's discussion.
All this orthagonalization is fine. To me the bottom line is still the
residuals and if the model can do a reasonable prediction just outside the
data set boundaries. Obviously the different methods and pruning out of
variables will give different values of
Quite frankly Robert the details are proprietary. I suppose I could have
been more descriptive, but I don't see what the shape of my distribution
have to do with what it represents. I have received several email replies
with various recommendations. I'll add transforming to the list. Not being
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000 19:46:11 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The answer they give is ( and I have no idea why ) :
>
> We will use the C to denote that the student owns a car and D to
> represent that the student owns a CD player.
>
> The events "owning a car" and "owning a CD player" are not m
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I was wondering if someone would be able to help me out with my
> Introduction to Statistics course I am taking. I am having problems
> with the following question :
>
> A survey of 300 senior high school students from St. Albert found that
> 180 of
Hello everyone.
I was wondering if someone would be able to help me out with my
Introduction to Statistics course I am taking. I am having problems
with the following question :
A survey of 300 senior high school students from St. Albert found that
180 of them either owned a car or a CD player.
I once wrote a "hostile review" because the author was bragging about his current
work, lots of hyperbole about how it would "revolutionize" something. I wouldn't
have minded if the author had known who wrote it, but it could have been
uncomfortable had I met him/her later.
In sci.stat.consult "Rui Jorge Gonalves" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
this is the same as eta squared which I mentioned before
: Dave Nulton wrote:
> I'm writing a simulator in C++. So far I have written a program to
collect
> data from a database and hope to be able to generate an algorithm to
return
> a random value with a distribution that matches my real world data. What
> I'm finding is that the data is UGLY. In
Sorry, this turned out to be rather longer than I'd anticipated.
Maybe I should have broken it into parts...
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999, Rich Ulrich wrote:
<< There were several earlier messages, and then
I thought Don Burrill said most of what needed to be said -- >>
[ snip, vario
Donald,
Sorry about the vagueness. You have answered my questions very
thoroughly. In response to your questions,
On 9 Jan 2000 21:42:51 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Donald F.
Burrill) wrote:
>This still does not describe what you used the test ON. Were they simply
>pairwise comparisons (treat
12 matches
Mail list logo
