On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, Bruce Weaver wrote in part, quoting Bob Frick:
... Bob Frick has some very interesting things to say about all of
this. For example, the following is taken from his 1995 Memory
Cognition paper (Vol 23, pp. 132-138), "Accepting the null hypothesis":
start quote
Title:
I apologise if this e-mail is sent to an
inappropriate e-mail list, but as I am a little desperate I am willing to give
it a try. Being an electronic engineering student statistics and
probability is not a strong point.I am trying to develop high level
characterisation for the power
I seem to recall that while back someone posted a listing of URLS for
examples of lessons in statistics using MS Excel. I wonder if anyone
has
that list or can recommend another source.
Thanks
Bill
===
This list is open
Elisa Wood wrote:
Can anyone help with good resources on the web, journals, books, etc on
cluster analysis - simularity and ordination. Any recommended programs
for this type of analysis too.
Classification Society of North America
http://www.pitt.edu/~csna/
--
Paige Miller
Eastman Kodak
Michael Granaas wrote:
I want to see if I am interpreting your meaning correctly. If some value
such as "3" comes from some place sensible then your null here would
represent the same idea that I have been expressing as (mu1 - mu2) - 3 =
0?
Yes.
-Robert Dawson
I used to receive a catalog (I believe it was called "Scientific Software"
or "Scientific and Engineering Solutions" or something like that) that sold
products such as Gauss, SAS, and MathCad.
Is this catalog still available? Does anyone have their phone number? Do
they have a web site?
Thanks
- Original Message -
From:
I wrote:
(4) In order to avoid circular logic, we *cannot* assume what we
want to
prove, in order to compute the probability. We can however assume it for
a
contradiction. Therefore...
and Michael Granaas responded
This (point 4) is certainly what
The Classification Society of North America is a group of people who do
these kinds of things. they have the Journal of Classification.
see
http://www.pitt.edu/~csna/
Elisa Wood wrote:
Can anyone help with good resources on the web, journals, books, etc on
cluster analysis - simularity and
here are two sample r values ... done in minitab ... and the associated output
Correlations: C52, C53
Pearson correlation of C52 and C53 = 0.599
P-Value = 0.000
MTB corr c54 c55
Correlations: C54, C55
Pearson correlation of C54 and C55 = 0.586
P-Value = 0.075
now, minitab prints out a p
If the null hypothesis is H0: mu1-mu2=0
and the alternative is H1: mu1-mu20
What does the test say about mu1-mu2 if we reject H0 at level
alpha(say at the magical 0.05)? Not much on its own. However, what
if we plan a statistical experiment as follows:
Given a desired power of
dennis roberts wrote:
this was not about a difference in rhos .. just the rho singly from that
population ...
It can be framed similarly replace mu1-mu2 with rho
If the null hypothesis is H0:rho=0
and the alternative is H1:rho0
What does the test say about rho if we reject H0 at
at the bottom
dennis roberts wrote:
At 11:26 AM 4/11/00 -0400, you wrote:
dennis roberts wrote:
this was not about a difference in rhos .. just the rho singly from that
population ...
It can be framed similarly replace mu1-mu2 with rho
If the null hypothesis is
On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, Robert Dawson wrote:
- Original Message -
I wrote:
(4) In order to avoid circular logic, we *cannot* assume what we
want to
prove, in order to compute the probability. We can however assume it for
a
contradiction. Therefore...
and Michael
I agree that rho=0 as typically used is silly. Well are
you are arguing then for the Bayesian framework of getting a probability
distribution on rho.??
dennis roberts wrote:
At 11:58 AM 4/11/00 -0400, you wrote:
at the bottom
it would be easy to show whether rho is more likely closer
i found this ... someone has made some excel demos ... using the lotus
product screencam ... which shows desktop work ...
http://www.business.utah.edu/~mgtdgw/statmov.htm
screencam can be seen at
http://www.lotus.com/home.nsf/welcome/screencam
you need a screencam player ... which is a
At 02:29 PM 4/11/00 -0300, Robert Dawson wrote:
The problem is that failure to reject means *either* that the null is
true *or* that the sample size too small *or* both;
"or" both says then ... that the null IS true AND that sample size is
TOO small ...
too small for what???
At 02:29 PM 4/11/00 -0300, Robert Dawson wrote:
The problem is that failure to reject means *either* that the null
is
true *or* that the sample size too small *or* both;
and Dennis Roberts responded
"or" both says then ... that the null IS true AND that sample size is
TOO small
I have been reading all the back and forth about hypothesis testing with
some degree of fascination. It's a topic of particular interest to me -
I presented a paper called 'Hypothesis testing and the Westminster
System' at the ISI conference in Helsinki last year.
What I find fascinating is the
At 07:12 PM 4/10/00 -0700, David A. Heiser wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Michael Granaas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
Our current verbal lables leave much to be desired.
Depending on who you ask the "null hypothesis" is
a) a hypothesis of no effect
19 matches
Mail list logo