Donald,
I totally agree w/your point about the stratification of the sample. My
facts were set up merely for simplicity's sake notwithstanding their clear
artificiality.
The only instances of multiple samples I have seen are in textbooks to prove
the CLT; that w/increasing numbers of sample
On Sun, 30 Sep 2001 00:34:40 GMT, John Jackson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is my solution using figures which are self-explanatory:
Sample Size Determination
pi = 50% central area 0.99
confid level= 99%
Turns out the method I originally suggested is unnecessarily cumbersome.
A more elegant method is described below.
On Sat, 29 Sep 2001, Donald Burrill wrote in part:
COPY c1-c35 to c41-c75; # Always retain the original data
OMIT c1 = '*';
OMIT c2 = '*';
. . . ;
