On Wed, 17 May 2000 01:57:41 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip, stuff from previous response. About F-max
... And finally could one say that there
is a "significant" difference in heteroscedasticity between the "A"
samples than the "B" samples based soley on the
At 11:08 AM 5/17/00 -0400, you wrote:
On Wed, 17 May 2000 01:57:41 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip, stuff from previous response. About F-max
... And finally could one say that there
is a "significant" difference in heteroscedasticity between the "A"
samples than
Is it possible to compare two unrelated groups of samples using
Hartley's F-max? In other words if I have two groups of samples, can I
use Hartley's F-max to compare their "heterogeneity" without taking
into account their respective means?
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
On Tue, 16 May 2000 15:21:34 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to compare two unrelated groups of samples using
Hartley's F-max? In other words if I have two groups of samples, can I
use Hartley's F-max to compare their "heterogeneity" without taking
into account their respective
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What you do mean when you say, "I have two groups of samples"?
How does this differ from having one large group of samples?
Hartley's will *always* take into account the respective means, in
the sense that the variance are
