"Jose Ramon G. Albert" wrote:
Try having the points enumerated be the centers of your rectangles
with each rectangle having an AREA of 1/6. Thus the first rectangle
should have its corners at 1.25 and 1.75 (and have 1.5 as its midpoint).
Now since the width of your rectange is 0.5, let the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 8lalui$655$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8lalui$655$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
SAS seems
to be the only program that is flexible enough to run on unix and be
automated. I would prefer a more simplistic approach as there is _a
lot_ of overhead in starting to use
P.G.Hamer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a free Splus look-similar (with poorer graphics?) called R. Look
for it in statlib (possibly netlib).
The actual site of the R statistical programming environment is
www.cran.r-project.org
Cheers.
Jose Ramon G. Albert
Chief, Research
You might want to look at AVAS (Additivity and Variance Stabilising
Regression).
As part of a regression process it finds transformations which may
go a long way towards solving your problem.
Peter
Eric Turkheimer schrieb:
I am interested in whether there is a literature on variance
On 9 Aug 2000 21:26:59 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Donald Burrill)
wrote in sci.stat.edu in article
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
:Sounds as though you are confusing a couple of things, as some of the
:responders to your message have suggested (though none has said it
:explicitly). The idea of "area under
Sheila King wrote:
[cross-posted to sci.stat.edu,sci.stat.math,k12.ed.math]
I'm teaching a GE stat course, my first time teaching stat, and am
having some points of confusion. Here is one of my questions:
Suppose I have a probability distribution as follows:
Sample space:
1.5, 2.0,
Mark Glickman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 8mpu19$s57$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8mpu19$s57$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
In sci.stat.edu Petr Kuzmic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: "Gordon D. Pusch" wrote:
: When I was in Grad-school, if I allocated only the the Departmental
: ``officially
David A. Heiser wrote:
von Mises criticizes Fisher (1921) for his introduction of the term
"likelihood" without defining it, since in common usage, 'likelihood'
and 'probability" have the same meaning.
Fisher may have addressed this issue in the preface to the thirteenth
edition of his book,
