"Ken" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Of course you'll get what you pay for.
Nonsense. http://www.visualstats.org/ http://www.r-project.org/
=
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I expected this to be a fairly common problem and hoped that a
standard "formula" would already exist for it. As you quite correctly
show, there are a huge number of possible scores given 10 grades (I
thought of working this out but I think the factorials get too
"Gaj Vidmar" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
there seems to be no word from professional statisticians yet, so here's an
addenum.
This message was posted in many places, so presumably we will get a
summary of responses if we care?
My own suggestion (mangled by a bad emailer) was to use vector time
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (dennis roberts) writes:
i know this is picky ... but, i say this is correct
Unfortunately, I believe the courts disagree with you. Intuitively
"unfair" software licences are common-place and it will not change
until people realise that they are not buying the *software* but
