In article x5rf6.393$[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Alan Miller amiller @ vic.bigpond.net.au wrote:
Kumara Sastry wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Suppose, X ~ Binomial(n1,p1), Y~Binomial(n2,p2) , and X and Y are
independent. Also, Z = X+Y. Can anyone please comment on what the pdf
of Z is?
Thanks
Caroline Brown wrote:
HI
I have an analysis problem, which I am researching solutions to, and David
Howell of UVM suggested I mail the query to you.
My problem is how to deal with a two way- repeated measures design,
in which one cell could not be measured:
A1 A2 A3
B1 ok ok
Incorrectly? Would you please expand your thought.
The only thing that might be called an error in
his laws, that comes immediately to mind, is the
fact that he didn't allow for the small problem of
two genes being on the same chromosome -- but then
he didn't know about chromosomes. Is this what
Bob Wheeler wrote:
Your point is a good one, but as a side issue, let
me object to the word "fudged." It implies
chicanery, which is not something that even Fisher
cared to imply. No one will ever know why Mendel's
results appear as they do, but It was not
necessarily with an intent to
No long term contract
No activation fee
No big prepayment of airtime
No credit check
PAGING AMERICA is going to give you absolutely Free the Brand new Motorola
Accessmate E-Mail display pager. This is the top of the line PCS technology
pager made today. This side viewable
Hi
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Thom Baguley wrote:
Donald Burrill wrote:
Well, it _might_ be. Depends on what hypothesis was being tested,
doesn't it? And so far "rjkim" hasn't deigned to tell us that.
Yes, though I think the vocabulary can obscure what goes on. To me a
"one-tailed" test
