In article 9deiug$l0h$[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Ronald Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Significance tests for 2x2 tables require that the single observed
table be regarded as if it were, (under the null hypothesis of
uniformity or independence) but a single instance drawn at
random from a universe
In sci.stat.edu Herman Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Each one of these probability setups 1-3 gives rise to a somewhat
different small-sample inferential test. In particular,
the schemes (1),(2),(3) give rise to distributions conditioned
on 3, 2, and 1 fixed parameters respectively.
But
A colleague has a data set with a structure like the one below:
ID X1 X2 Y
1 1 0.700.40
2 1 0.800.40
3 1 0.650.40
4 2 1.200.25
5 2 1.100.25
6 3 0.900.30
7 4 0.500.50
8
- selecting from CH's article, and re-formatting. I don't know if
I am agreeing, disagreeing, or just rambling on.
On 4 May 2001 10:15:23 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Carl Huberty)
wrote:
CH: Why do articles appear in print when study methods, analyses,
results, and conclusions are somewhat
- I offer a suggestion of a reference.
On 10 May 2001 17:25:36 GMT, Ronald Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ snip, much detail ]
It has become the custom, in epidemiological reports
to use always the hypergeometric inference test --
The Fisher Exact Test -- when treating 2x2 tables
In sci.stat.consult Ronald Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Herman as usual is absolutely correct; the validity of the Fisher test is
analagous to the validity of regression tests which are derived
conditional on x but, since the distribution does not involve x, are valid
unconditionally even if
this is not unlike having scores for students in a class ... one score for
each student and ... the age of the teacher of THOSE students ... for a
class ... scores will vary but, age for the teacher remains the same ...
but the age might be different in ANother class with a different teacher
In sci.stat.edu Ronald Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It has become the custom, in epidemiological reports
to use always the hypergeometric inference test --
The Fisher Exact Test -- when treating 2x2 tables
arising from all manner of experimental setups -- e.g.
Only for tables with small
I have a sample set of series of state-changes/events/behaviors, from this
sample I'd like to generalize a scoring method for the likelihood of a
criterion behavior on other data sets.
Could someone guide me to the appropriate statistical technique for this
type of problem and any useful
Subject: Re: (none)
From: Rich Ulrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 5/10/2001 5:15 PM Eastern
Snip?
CH: Why do articles appear in print when study methods, analyses,
results, and conclusions are somewhat faulty?
- I suspect it might be a consequence of Sturgeon's Law,
named after the science
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Magill, Brett wrote, inter alia:
How should these data be analyzed? The difficulty is that the data
are cross level. Not the traditional multi-level model however.
Hi, Brett. I don't understand this statement. Looks to me like an
obvious place to apply multilevel
11 matches
Mail list logo
