Le mardi 13 mars 2007 à 22:47 -0300, Gustavo Maciel Dias Vieira a
écrit :
Hi Damien,
Thanks for your reply, sorry for my delay this time around. :)
Em Ter, 2007-02-20 às 22:54 +0100, Damien Sandras escreveu:
What is the difference between udp_timeout and udp_timeout_stream ?
Le mercredi 14 mars 2007 à 10:22 -0300, Gustavo Maciel Dias Vieira a
écrit :
Em Qua, 2007-03-14 às 14:13 +0100, Damien Sandras escreveu:
Ok, I used tcpdump to monitor all traffic to ekiga.net and there are
no
packets sent every 30 seconds. The ip conntrack tables also don't
indicate
Le mercredi 14 mars 2007 à 10:29 -0300, Gustavo Maciel Dias Vieira a
écrit :
Em Qua, 2007-03-14 às 14:24 +0100, Damien Sandras escreveu:
This key :
/apps/ekiga/general/nat/binding_timeout
It shows the value 60 in my setup. Does it mean a packet would be
sent
every 60 seconds?
Hi Damien,
Thanks for your reply, sorry for my delay this time around. :)
Em Ter, 2007-02-20 às 22:54 +0100, Damien Sandras escreveu:
What is the difference between udp_timeout and udp_timeout_stream ?
udp_timeout applies to new connections. udp_timeout_stream applies to
assured
Em Qua, 2007-03-14 às 14:13 +0100, Damien Sandras escreveu:
Ok, I used tcpdump to monitor all traffic to ekiga.net and there are
no
packets sent every 30 seconds. The ip conntrack tables also don't
indicate any activity.
Is there any option in Ekiga that I could have mistakenly
Em Qua, 2007-03-14 às 14:24 +0100, Damien Sandras escreveu:
This key :
/apps/ekiga/general/nat/binding_timeout
It shows the value 60 in my setup. Does it mean a packet would be
sent
every 60 seconds? Unfortunately, that is not happening.
Anything else you want me to check?
Le mercredi 14 mars 2007 à 14:42 +0100, Damien Sandras a écrit :
Le mercredi 14 mars 2007 à 10:29 -0300, Gustavo Maciel Dias Vieira a
écrit :
Em Qua, 2007-03-14 às 14:24 +0100, Damien Sandras escreveu:
This key :
/apps/ekiga/general/nat/binding_timeout
It shows the value 60
Le mercredi 14 mars 2007 à 15:17 +0100, yannick a écrit :
Le mercredi 14 mars 2007 à 14:42 +0100, Damien Sandras a écrit :
Le mercredi 14 mars 2007 à 10:29 -0300, Gustavo Maciel Dias Vieira a
écrit :
Em Qua, 2007-03-14 às 14:24 +0100, Damien Sandras escreveu:
This key :
Hi,
Added to the wiki:
http://wiki.ekiga.org/index.php/Ekiga_behind_a_NAT_router
Mostly it's a cut'n paste from Gustavo first mail.
I also added this line to the script:
http://wiki.ekiga.org/index.php/Ekiga_behind_a_NAT_router#What_iptables_rules_could_I_use_for_GNU.2FLinux.3F
echo 3600
Le mercredi 14 mars 2007 à 16:06 +0100, yannick a écrit :
Hi,
Added to the wiki:
http://wiki.ekiga.org/index.php/Ekiga_behind_a_NAT_router
Mostly it's a cut'n paste from Gustavo first mail.
I also added this line to the script:
I can send a chat message from my Ekiga (compiled 6/3/07 on Mandriva Linux
2007) to my sister's Ekiga for win32 (2/3/07) but when she wants to answer
something back her Ekiga for win32 crashes.
Dieter
___
ekiga-list mailing list
ekiga-list@gnome.org
I compiled and installed linux-uvc (uvcvideo module with v4l2 device driver)
with luvcview to view video of my USB Logitech Quickcam Fusion webcam.
Everytime I reboot I have to use this command
luvcview -d /dev/video0 -f jpg -s 352x288
and set gamma down, then set gamma up (from 220 to 100 to
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 18:24:38 +0100
Damien Sandras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe statefull UDP firewalls without NAT are not that common
now, but still many people are behind them. And I'm sure this type
of firewall will become more common as we move to IPv6...
I suppose so, NAT will
My Ekiga (compiled 6/3/07 on Mandriva Linux 2007) pushes cpu load to 99% when
I'm video-conferencing with my sister or doing an echo test to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My computer is an AMD Athlon 1600+.
Is this normal? Is it known what part of Ekiga is so processor intensive?
Dieter
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:45:34 +0100
Dieter Rogiest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My Ekiga (compiled 6/3/07 on Mandriva Linux 2007) pushes cpu load to
99% when I'm video-conferencing with my sister or doing an echo test
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] My computer is an AMD Athlon 1600+.
Is this normal? Is it
Dieter Rogiest a écrit :
at my sister's place I installed ekiga for windows (2/3/2007) on WinXP.
She has a adsl router/modem Zyxel.
The configuration druid: detecting NAT: it always detects symmetric nat no
matter how many ports I forward from the router to the computer.
Just by chance I 've
Dieter Rogiest a écrit :
I can send a chat message from my Ekiga (compiled 6/3/07 on Mandriva Linux
2007) to my sister's Ekiga for win32 (2/3/07) but when she wants to answer
something back her Ekiga for win32 crashes.
Sending a message gives a reliable crash ?
That's strange since that
On Wednesday 14 March 2007 20:47, Julien Puydt wrote:
Dieter Rogiest a écrit :
at my sister's place I installed ekiga for windows (2/3/2007) on WinXP.
She has a adsl router/modem Zyxel.
The configuration druid: detecting NAT: it always detects symmetric nat
no matter how many ports I
Le mercredi 14 mars 2007 à 23:08 +0100, Dieter Rogiest a écrit :
On Wednesday 14 March 2007 21:20, Damien Sandras wrote:
That is because of the above explanation: don't use snapshots and expect
reliable quality. Please use a stable release and report back.
Thanks,
OK, I've compiled
19 matches
Mail list logo
