Hello All,
I'm happy to announce to the list that K2 Basic Kit #4068 is up and
running @ f8bxi.
I bought it back last June and had a lot of troubles only due to myself
and mistakes I made due to lack of experience :
- 1 missing solder on U6 Control Board (stressful but fun to solve)
- 1 J310
Bob,
The cheapest GPS receiver I ever bought costs $100 compared to the $25
for the WWV clock. That was a couple of years ago, and the cost of both
has come down. That's the why.
Chas
At 12:34 AM 1/9/2005, Robert Rennard wrote:
Why not just use a cheap GPS receiver instead of a WWVB
All,
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 9:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Atomic Clocks and Aluminum Siding
Anybody else on this reflector ever been to the WWV transmitter site?
I was
there
A GPS receiver inside an aluminum-sided house may also have some
trouble. Mine, which has no external antenna, has trouble picking up
satellites in my (brick-sided) house and in my (metal-sided) car, other
than on the dashboard near the windshield. If I ever get lost in my
basement, the GPS
I was wondering if anyone has evaluated the K2 receiver performance numbers
with the KSB2 as the principle IF filter instead of the onboard filter
adjusted to 500Hz bandwidth? I expect the 5Khz BDR and IMD DR3 might suffer
somewhat, but has anyone actually played with this?
IMD DR3 seems to
Original message below:
From: Steve Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Elecraft] 48V, plus or minus, usually
It's that 50 volt 20 amp supply
that's a killer!
Actually, this voltage/current is very easy to comeby, and relatively low in
cost. The telephone
industry uses this voltage and at high
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 06:04:49 -0700, Dave White wrote:
I was wondering if anyone has evaluated the K2 receiver performance numbers
with the KSB2 as the principle IF filter instead of the onboard filter
adjusted to 500Hz bandwidth? I expect the 5Khz BDR and IMD DR3 might suffer
somewhat, but
I was wanting a Nixie tube clock (either kit or assembled). I have been
using the search terms (Nixie clock) on EBay for a few months. A fellow
there has been offering a Nixie clock with a built-in GPS receiver, and with
an external GPS antenna. If I remember correctly, it was a little
To bad they don't make one that you can interface your existing GPS
receiver to.
Stan Rife
W5EWA
Houston, TX
K2 S/N 4216
-Original Message-
From: Dan Allen
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Atomic Clocks and Aluminum Siding
I was wanting a Nixie
Several years ago I had the opportunity to visit the WWVH site on
Kaua'i. I drove into the site, found the office, went in and there was
NO ONE there. Oh, well...I signed the visitor log and scanned through
it, noticing the large number of hams who had visited. I even recognized
some of the calls.
Charles wrote:
The cheapest GPS receiver I ever bought costs $100 compared to the $25
for the WWV clock. That was a couple of years ago, and the cost of both
has come down. That's the why.
-
I thought atomic clocks were desired for their gee whiz
For some digital modes, you have to know the time to the second or close to it,
as some digital sequences are 15 or 30 seconds long. Even for typical SHF
terrestrial work, the common adage is You call on the odd, I call on the
even. There are 60 and 30 second sequences on that too I believe.
Well, there are times when you need fairly accurate time. When
tracking satellites across the sky for the digital modes, or the weather
sats. Your tracking software has to be pretty close to the correct time to
keep up with the position of the satellites. I have a controller that moves
the
Ron:
Probably, unless one is using some very exotic mode such as Coherent CW,
millisecond synchronization is not actually required for ham operations.
However, there are some fairly routine operations in which sub-second
resolution is a necessity and not a luxury. These include the
I've just started building my K2, and although it's not my first kit, I have
only built a couple smaller kits. I have a couple newbie questions, that I'd
rather not burden Elecraft with directly (unless necessary). These questions
came up during my parts inventory of the RF board.
1. For C33
A few people have written with questions. Here are a couple more photos.
The top cover of the KAT-100 is not used.
Here's another photo of from the side showing how the two units are mounted to
each other:
http://www.k2ta.com/k2plus1_leftside.jpg
Also...as an afterthought I added a
Yep. Several ops mentioned modes I don't use G.
I often use the propagation beacons at 20 meters and down, but my PC clock
is synched to NIS through the internet connection, so it's always dead on
for that purpose.
Is it okay if I buy an atomic clock some day for the 'Gee Whiz' factor G?
Ron
NO G
Stan Rife
W5EWA
Houston, TX
K2 S/N 4216
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron D'Eau Claire
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 4:23 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] Atomic Clocks and Aluminum Siding
Yep.
And, if anyone wants, I will send them a picture I took of two
identical model atomic clocks, both showing that they are locked
and showing different times (nothing doctored in the picture, time
zones the same, etc.).
Hmmm...I wonder why they call them Atomic Clocks? Other than being
made
I'm seeing some funny results on Part II. I set up the 4 MHz oscillator
by zero beating it with my Jupitor. The PLL reference oscillator showed:
High freq. 12100.48 Low freq. 12090.94 Range 9.54KHz
This was pretty close to the value of 9.8 KHz and might be explained by
the
Almost everything in life can be overdone, except for K2 Mojo. I have
GPS clocks at work that keep the PC's all agreeing with each other. But
I did want a Gee-Whiz factor for the shack. At Dayton last year I bought
my very first MFJ product, a Model 121 clock. This is a large Dual LCD
readout
Ron, AC7AC wrote:
That means my $6 Radio Shack digital clock that I chose because it was
on sale and provides a 24-hour time format is perfect. It stays accurate
to within one or two seconds a month.
==
I guess I'm more of a perfectionist than Ron. After three or four
battery-operated
Anybody else on this reflector ever been to the WWV transmitter site? I was
there circa 1992.
I live two miles from WWV. I get accurate time on my atomic clock, my
telephone, my stereo, my TV...
--
73, Jay K0GU DN70mq
___
Elecraft
Hello gang...
I was wondering if anyone one the list uses the linux logging program xLog. I
have three questions...
1. under what distribution of linux are you using?
2. when you installed it, did you get the dependency error Libexpat.so.1
missing.
3. will it function properly if compiled with
The EC2 could be a nice companion to a K2/100 when using for portable
QRP if it contained the KAT100; more amp-hours in battery storage as
compared to the single 2.9 A/H battery in a traditional K2; and
battery/monitoring /charging cicuitry. If anyone has done this I would
like to hear from
On Sun, 2005-09-01 at 21:04 -0600, Tom Harson wrote:
I was wondering if anyone one the list uses the linux logging program xLog. I
have three questions...
1. under what distribution of linux are you using?
Fedora Core 3.
2. when you installed it, did you get the dependency error
Hello Folks,
Another evening on the air. Some folks were taking a break from the
RTTY contest and others from the NA QSO party. Thanks for stopping by.
The KX1s seem to have something special going for them once again. From
Hawaii to Virginia to California to Alaska those rigs are
ADDENDUM ANNOUNCEMENT:
Corrections too. Just in from Tom.
On 40:
AH6RE CurtHI Running 100W but has a KX1 464
N9IVRuss - IN - KX1 - 742
VE3XL - Ric - ON - K1??? - 968 Is your K1 still on the bench Ric?
Thanks to you all. One day we need to meet somewhere and talk face to
Thanks Brian...
I kind of figured that I could use --nodeps...
I appreciate the help..
73 de Tom K5VJZ k2-4279
On Sunday 09 January 2005 22:09, Brian Mury wrote:
On Sun, 2005-09-01 at 21:04 -0600, Tom Harson wrote:
I was wondering if anyone one the list uses the linux logging program
xLog.
Hello All,
Anyone using the Idiom Press SCAF-1 audio filter with their K2 and/ or
older tube receivers? How does it compare with DSP audio filters. 99%
of my operating is CW so SSB is not that important to me. I would like
to hear your comments and experiences.
ps. I've had the Autek QF-1
I was wanting a Nixie tube clock (either kit or assembled).
Hello, Dan. Check out: http://www.neonnixie.com/ , the site of a friend of a
friend.
You have good taste. Nixies look totally cool. Much better that 7-segment
displays. Just look at a Nixie 9. It's got so much beauty and
I use it and like it. I find the SCAF-1 complements the capabilities of the
DSP in my K2.
- Paul, N6LQ
- Original Message -
From: Larry - WA2DGD [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Elecraft Reflector Elecraft@mailman.qth.net; QRP-L
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 8:38 PM
Subject:
Check out this for a Nixie clock, and the Scope clock.
http://www.cathodecorner.com/
A GPS-driven clock that could display three time zones
with day and dates (one GPS board, driving up to three or four
clock/display boards) would be great. In my shack, an external
antenna for the GPS seems to
You probably just need to instalexpat and expat-devel rpms...they come
with Fedora Core 3. Joop is an FB OM...I have been working with him on
XDIF support.
Lrigh.
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 7:06 pm, Tom Harson wrote:
Hello gang...
I was wondering if anyone one the list uses the linux logging program
ya, ya
as an old Cdn AF Nav plus an astro-physicist, I'll stick with WWV!
Ron VA6RL
- Original Message -
From: Fred Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Elecraft Reflector elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 4:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Atomic Clocks and Aluminum
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005, Tom Harson wrote:
1. under what distribution of linux are you using?
Debian Sarge
2. when you installed it, did you get the dependency error Libexpat.so.1
missing.
Nope.
3. will it function properly if compiled with the -nodeps ?
I believe this kind of questions is
At 12:34 PM -0800 1/9/05, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:
I thought atomic clocks were desired for their gee whiz interest, not
because someone usually needs to know what time it is to the nearest
millisecond.
I'm serious about the value of the gee whiz factor as in, Gee whiz! Look
at that!
After
37 matches
Mail list logo