Bill:
I just finished installing the new boards in both my K3's. I did one
radio complete and then did a quick test on 80m and 20m with both
radios. I found the new boards quiets the receiver
down somewhat and makes it easier to pull out the weaker signals. I
have pretty quiet conditions at
Thank you for all the answers - here and email. I appreciate the
candidness.
Unfortunately, for Elecraft, I have decided to keep my K3 as it is. In
my instance, I don't see enough potential improvement to justify the
expense and labor (considerable to get the rig to the bench and back). I
That’s kind of what I’ve been thinking too, Bill. With my often high noise
level suburban location combined with modest wire and vertical antennas I think
it would be overkill and not worth the investment. As it is I often joke that
the K3 for me like driving a McLaren to the grocery store-way
George,
Just to confirm -- you are referring to the Noise Reduction function that
is evoked by pressing the "NR" button; correct?
If so, why should it be ANY different at all from that of the K3, given
the same firmware revision level, in which case I would assume the exact
same algorithm is in
That’s interesting. The K3 and K3S use the same DSP algorithm (same firmware)
to accomplish NR. In what way do you perceive it being different? Are the
settings (AGC threshold, etc) the same on the all of the radios?
Grant NQ5T
> On Sep 6, 2015, at 11:28 AM, george fritkin via Elecraft
>
I have my "old K3" on QTH.com, priced at what it would take to get it.
Meanwhile it is still on my operating desk and if no one wants it, then
it will stay right here, hooked up and ready to roll. Who knows I might
try satellite again and a second K3 so I can run full duplex with my K3s
works
I have 2K3s and the new K3S. The noise reduction function much better on K3S
73dsGeorge, WGF
On Sunday, September 6, 2015 8:35 AM, Jim Rogers
wrote:
I have my "old K3" on QTH.com, priced at what it would take to get it.
Meanwhile it is still on my operating
I have two K3s and now a new K3S. I not sure the sync card makes much
difference, but the noise reduction is now outstanding.
George, W6GF
PS: A great radio was made greater
On Saturday, September 5, 2015 9:39 AM, Phil Wheeler
wrote:
Bob,
I noticed an
Why fight with success? IMHO, you'd never know the difference.
Wes N7WS
K3 S/N 2058
K3S S/N 10020
On 9/5/2015 6:03 AM, Bill wrote:
My K3 is from early 2012 - ser: 62xx. I don't contest or DX - just rag chew on
160/75/40 - makes a super 500 Watt station. Rarely do I touch any controls
other
Bob,
I noticed an improvement right away just by tuning
20 CW during a very active contest weekend. My
ability to pull out weak signals was much enhanced.
But I do agree completely with you for Bill's
purposes "I don't contest or DX - just rag chew on
160/75/40... ".
73, Phil W7OX
On
Bill,
I upgraded the synth and have not noticed any difference whatsoever. That is
not to say there is none, only that I could not tell any difference since I
could not do any A/B comparisons. I am very skeptical of those who claim to
have noticed a difference without having done an actual A/B
NK7Z has some A/B comparisons that show some improvement and I thought I
heard the same differences during a contest.
However, I bet you won't see that much difference using LSB on the lower
bands. I am quite jealous of your noise levels.
On Sat, 5 Sep 2015, Phil Wheeler wrote:
Bob,
I
My K3 is from early 2012 - ser: 62xx. I don't contest or DX - just rag
chew on 160/75/40 - makes a super 500 Watt station. Rarely do I touch
any controls other than the VFO or band switch. My QTH is very low noise
- typical local daytime noise level barely registers on the P3 (think
S-0).
I consider myself a casual operator. I get on when I can, avoid the contests,
rag chew a lot, and have fun. I mostly work SSB with my K3 but am working on
code speed. I use WIN4K3 as a control program and panadaptor.
These differences are purely subjective and without measurement. All
14 matches
Mail list logo