Hi, Roger.
What's in a name? Herein lies some of the confusion. On the K3, the 100W amp
is the KPA3, not KPA100 (K2 amp). As to your problem, would it not be more
efficient to use the low level output available from the KXV3(a) to drive
your transverter? This would eliminate the waste of all
-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Bruce Beford
Sent: 29 June 2011 08:42
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3- Higher Power on Transverter bands??
Hi, Roger.
What's in a name? Herein lies some
Ah, I see. Time is always the enemy, isn't it? 8-)
Have fun this weekend in the VHF Field Day!
73,
Bruce, N1RX
However (!!) I am resurrecting my old 70cms system for the European VHF
Field Day this weekend. That was designed many many years ago to work
with
the then availability of 10 watt
Hi Roger,
I should have twigged that you were using a K3 not a K2, so many thanks to
Bruce N1RX for his comment.
The low power drive solution would be the best option IF you had the time,
provided of course that the IMD contributed by any additional amp if
required in the transverter was
4 matches
Mail list logo