[Elecraft] Elecraft] K3 LONG delay in TX after TXINH removed (solved)

2013-01-27 Thread Edward R Cole
Although Mark has solved his INH problem, I thought I would share my ckt for using the inhibit function with the K3 (in fact it also has ckts for inhibiting a FT-847 which I no longer have): http://www.kl7uw.com/TX-INHIBIT.htm I use the Band-0 and Band-1 select functions to control VHF

Re: [Elecraft] K3 LONG delay in TX after TXINH removed (solved)

2013-01-27 Thread Mark
Be aware that Ed's circuit is much like mine in that it does not have a pull down on the TxInh line. Therefore it could act like mine did and extend the time till transmit is enabled. A resistor to ground might be a good addition if this is important. Also as a side note, the kx3 is

Re: [Elecraft] K3 LONG delay in TX after TXINH removed (solved)

2013-01-27 Thread Mark
Oops, the txinh in Ed's circuit is done with relay k4 which pulls the line to ground, eliminating Any ambiguity. My mistake was assuming k1 was doing this function, instead of its clearly indicated action of switching control between the k3 and ft 847. Mea culpa Mark. N2QT On Jan 27,

[Elecraft] K3 LONG delay in TX after TXINH removed (solved)

2013-01-26 Thread Mark n2qt
My TxInh circuit diode or'd various inputs together. What I did not do is put a resistor to ground after the diodes. The K3 TxInh input does not have a pull down, and has a high enough impedance that there is an appreciable time delay before the TxInh coasts down to where it allows the K3 to

Re: [Elecraft] K3 LONG delay in TX after TXINH removed (solved)

2013-01-26 Thread Don Wilhelm
Mark, It is good to hear that the resistor solved the problem. If you had to add a pull-down resistor, that is not a K3 problem, that is a requirement of whatever in your sequencer that is driving the K3 TX INH line. In other words, whatever is driving your TX INH line is not going to zero