On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 12:12 -0800, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:
There were some microphones produced for the communications market back
then such as the famous Astatic D-104 which had a microphone element with a
shaped response showing a distinct hump around 3 kHz, rolling off slowly at
lower
Thanks for posting your interesting comments Brendan.
Within the context of SSB useage in ham radio I believe that the 'hype about
audio' could lead to another related problem, if not already existing, which
is poor use of the HF spectrum available to us. Given the proven fact that a
SSB
I've heard it said that some contest stations deliberately transmit a
wider-than-necessary signal to keep competitiors away from their channel.
David
G3UNA
Within the context of SSB useage in ham radio I believe that the 'hype about
audio' could lead to another related problem, if
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've heard it said that some contest stations deliberately transmit a
wider-than-necessary signal to keep competitiors away from their channel.
Ahmust be one of those advance the technology things that justify
contestsgood for everyone.
I've heard it said that some contest stations deliberately transmit
a wider-than-necessary signal to keep competitiors away from
their channel.
I personally would not intentionally transmit a wide signal during a
contest. It would, imho, be counterproductive, apart from any other
At 08:28 AM 2/14/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote...
This is why you want to have a signal with a very high average power
level, but one which is also not wider than necessary.
That sounds like CW. :-)
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to:
Subject: Re: Re: [Elecraft] Microphones (was electronic product standards)
I've heard it said that some contest stations deliberately transmit
a wider-than-necessary signal to keep competitiors away from
their channel.
I personally would not intentionally transmit a wide signal during
I read years ago that speech processors like pre-emphasized audio
(louder highs, quieter lows). And the heavier the processing the more
pre-emphasis is optimum. Does anyone know if the K3 speech processor
does that automatically?
Al N1AL
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 01:52, Brendan Minish wrote:
On
8 matches
Mail list logo