Keep in mind that you can do point/click freqeuncy changes from the
bandmap in certain logging programs. Both N1MM (contesting) and
Logger32 (general logger) offer rapid QSY that way I assume others
do as well. If you spot a frequency of interest on the Rocky display,
you could do the
gt; From: w3...@embarqmail.com
> To: lesch...@gmail.com
> CC: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] P3 or KRX3
>
> Bob,
>
> You are partially correct. To be specific, LP-PAN is a glorified
> Softrock plus Clifton Labs Z1 with transformer coupling
Hi. I just want to mention re KRx3, good antennas on the 2nd receiver are not
needed to make diversity the best feature on my K3. 2nd antenna here just a
floor to ceiling wire stuck to the wall using a little MFJ tuner. Main
antenna a 200' stealth end fed wire. 80% of the time diversity improves t
Bob,
You are partially correct. To be specific, LP-PAN is a glorified
Softrock plus Clifton Labs Z1 with transformer coupling to the
soundcard, all dressed up in an enclosure. If you compare the price of
all those pieces (particularly the enclosure), the price of the LP-PAN
is not out of
Is the LP-Pan nothing more than a glorified Softrock type of receiver which
can be bought for $10?
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft
Hi Bill,
I have the Sub RX and have found it to be something that I occasionally use.
If I operate an hour or two a day, I might use it continuously one day and
then not at all for the next three days. But I love it and would not want to
ever be without it.
I haven't yet ordered a P3 but can see
How about a K3 + SUBRX plus SDR/ROCKY or SDR/SKIMMER combo. Either SDR
has very easy to setup software.
Much cheaper than P3.
For cracking a big pileup, one needs some way of ID'ing the frequency of
the last N stations the DX worked.
A panadapter might or might not work well-- guys calling co
I added the second receiver for one reason ... monitoring
six meters for openings. In fact, it has only an antenna
connection on the rear of the K3 with no means to use
the other methods of feeding antennas to it's input.
As another poster has already pointed out, the K3 works
split well, and ..
Good question, Bill. I recently added both the sub RX and the P3 to my K3
SN 608, so am in a position to offer at least an opinion on the added
utility of each. It was also my first experience with either capability.
I'm mostly a CW contester but do some DXing and MW/SW listening. In a
nutshel
Go for the KRX3 this year and a P3 next
73 de M0XDF, K3 #174 (with KRX3), P3 #108
--
One glance at a book and you hear the voice of another person, perhaps someone
dead for 1,000 years. To read is to voyage through time.
-Carl Sagan, astronomer and writer (1934-1996)
On 13 Aug 2010, at 18:44, Bi
Bill Myers wrote:
>
> The KRX3 seemed like a natural next step. I am a "casual" DXer and
> contester, so it made sense to gain the features it would add, especially
> for SPLIT operation. But the K3 really has a good split system without
> the sub-RX - at least for my level of seriousness.
>
I need some advice about my next upgrade. My K3 (4380) does not have the
sub-Rx, which was my next planned addition. However, the P3 has attracted
my attention, and may be a better choice.
The KRX3 seemed like a natural next step. I am a "casual" DXer and
contester, so it made sense to gain t
12 matches
Mail list logo
