With so many musicians on here, including the K1/K2 designer, maybe someone
would comment on why sidetones are the frequency they are. Actually, I have
been thinking more about how people choose the OFFSET they prefer more than
the sidetone, but it's the same idea.
It's interesting that you
EricJ wrote:
It's interesting that you should say the sidetone was offensive because it
was not a pure sine wave. It is my understanding (not being a musician
myself), that humans prefer tones with harmonic content. Pure sine waves
sound simple and harsh to the ear.
Not harsh, but boring.
Hi Eric,
Interesting thoughts. I am a professional musician
and owner of a K1. I could write pages (and have,
back in school) on how and why pianos are tuned the
way they are -- they are giant mess, pitch-wise, for
many many reasons, but through lots of compramises you
end up with something
] Side Tone (Choosing the right music) Mostly OT
Hi Eric,
Interesting thoughts. I am a professional musician and owner of a K1. I
could write pages (and have, back in school) on how and why pianos are tuned
the way they are -- they are giant mess, pitch-wise, for many many reasons,
but through
Vic K2VCO wrote:
Not harsh, but boring. But anyway, the reason a pure sine wave is
desirable is that it makes matching pitch with a received signal easier.
Well, and bandwidth. A pure sine wave uses, errr, almost zero
bandwidth*, whereas one with harmonics needs somewhere to put those. A
500Hz
, 2006 3:10 PM
To: Vic K2VCO
Cc: EricJ; elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Side Tone (Choosing the right music)
Vic K2VCO wrote:
Not harsh, but boring. But anyway, the reason a pure sine wave is
desirable is that it makes matching pitch with a received signal easier.
Well
6 matches
Mail list logo