Peter,
As you say the K2's CW performance can't be praised too highly, however in my
opinion the SSB side is unfinished business.
You might like to look at my web site for some idea of what is wrong, and how
to
improve it.
http://homepages.nildram.co.uk/~baker/
73
Stewart G3RXQ
On Sun, 13
Having an FT857D and TS570D, when I compare the CW performance of my K2
with them, the K2 wins every time. Due in no small part to the narrow
roofing filter inherent in a single conversion receiver, the good and
quiet solid state change over and the low noise receiver.
On SSB the differences are
Dave G4AON wrote:
Having an FT857D and TS570D, when I compare the CW performance of my K2
with them, the K2 wins every time. Due in no small part to the narrow
roofing filter inherent in a single conversion receiver, the good and
quiet solid state change over and the low noise receiver.
Hi
I bought a K2 for SSB use ( + DSP option ).
In various reviews ( e.g. EHAM ) I noticed that K2's CW performance can't be
praised too highly, but there is a bit reserve as to the SSB performance.
In which respects - if at all - lags the SSB performance ?
And what would cause this ?
Thanks for
Hi Peter,
I think the K2 works as great on SSB as well as CW. For the last two
years I've set up mine for the SSB station for Field Day with another
nearly identical K2 built by my neighbor (well, about 5 miles away) used
on CW. Of course the CW station did more QSOs than the SSB station
are hot and heavy.
73,
N2TK, Tony
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of PE1E
Sent: Sunday, August 13, 2006 3:56 PM
To: Elecraft Reflector
Subject: [Elecraft] What makes K2's SSB performance less impressive than on
CW ?
I bought a K2 for SSB use
6 matches
Mail list logo
