Keith KD1E wrote:
I don't like the phrase communication quality. It lower's the bar to
accept anything that is marginal.
It can mean that to many Hams. That term, like so many, are misused in Ham
circles. Actually, communications quality is a very demanding level of
Keith wrote:
Any of you guys playing with hi-fi SSB with the K2? What have you done
to improve the quality of both RX and TX audio in this rig?
I think you need to identify which components of the tx-rx you find
deficient
that is for communications quality audio,,, or change the
On Thu, 25 May 2006 10:36:24 -0400, Darwin, Keith wrote:
Any of you guys playing with hi-fi SSB with the K2? What have you done
to improve the quality of both RX and TX audio in this rig?
This may sound trite, but I tried my hi-fi stereo headphones
instead of my communications headphones.
-Original Message-
From: Phil Kane
This may sound trite, but I tried my hi-fi stereo headphones
instead of my communications headphones. Boy. what a
difference!! I suspect, though, that all it does is to allow
more white noise and overtones to be heard. My desk mike
(Adonis
4 matches
Mail list logo