Given that my ears are not precision instruments (they roll of rapidly after
3500 Hz and have really bad hearing above that)...I too must agree with Don.
But, my experience has been that the K2 has a better sound that the PRO II ...
by far! I contest a lot...mostly CW (some SSB)...and I get ve
And I might add "Perception is 98% of reality" And that is true no
matter what the meters or instruments say.
73,
Don W3FPR
Darwin, Keith wrote:
On the topic of comparing radios...
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You mu
On the topic of comparing radios...
I've found that one must be careful on how the comparison is done.
You'll get a far better reading if you can hold everything constant
except for the rig under test.
I'll feed a single antenna to both rigs through an antenna switch
(maybe) and then send the aud
Yes, I think there is a lot going on in the modern stuff,
early stages being distorted, stuff getting through the filters,
and other sorts of distortion.
I have been into AM a long time, and fidelity there is important,
and all the modern rigs sound nasty on AM no matter what filters
they have, ev
There you hit the word I was looking for, "rumble". I have the narrow
250 Hz filter in a 706 and a 718. That sums up the difference between
them in the K2. With those filters there is more rumble, and sometimes
the signals blow right by the filters and blast you if you have the
volume up. W
I did some comparisons between my 756 pro and the K2
on 40 meters tonight, only CW, SSB always hurts my ears
so I cant say about that, plus I don't have the ssb option
added to the K2.
I used headphones, the same antenna, and tuned in strong
and weak signals, some had very close qso's going on, an
6 matches
Mail list logo