Ed, I'm waiting for my K3 and I'm a phone man at present (working on my
Morse).
I have a 2.8kHz and 400Hz on order. Reading your post, maybe I should
consider either a 1.8 or a 2.1 kHz filter too.
Given the option, which would choose?
Anyone else want to chip in too please.
Kind of decision I
Sorry, that should have been a choice between 1.5 1.8 ...
On 19/11/07 19:19, David Ferrington, M0XDF [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:
Ed, I'm waiting for my K3 and I'm a phone man at present (working on my
Morse).
I have a 2.8kHz and 400Hz on order. Reading your post, maybe I should consider
either
I can only second Ed's comments. I, too, am a non-phone operator
but SS did seem to be a good time to wring out the K3 on that mode.
It's true, the vox/anti vox is flawless. No first syllable clipping and no
annoying drop outs. The K3 audio is so clean that its a real
pleasure to listen to. Ed
11:21
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Elecraft Reflector
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 in SS Phone
Sorry, that should have been a choice between 1.5 1.8 ...
On 19/11/07 19:19, David Ferrington, M0XDF
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:
Ed, I'm waiting for my K3 and I'm a phone man at present
(working
Concerning SS Phone. The bands were extremely crowded which caused a whole lot
of stress on the operators and rigs. I was multi-op at W0NO this year and we
used a PROIII. I was not impressed. Well, it worked, but the fatigue I
experienced after a 4 hours stint on the extremely crowded
Having tried them out in a grim environment, if I were to do it now,
I'd go for the 1.8kHz filter. The 2.1 worked well, but
intelligebility (sp?) didn't suffer down to 1.8 (which I didn't
believe would be the case).
I'm not much of a 'phone op.
73, doug
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon,
In a message dated 11/19/2007 11:20:14 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ed, I'm waiting for my K3 and I'm a phone man at present (working on my
Morse).
I have a 2.8kHz and 400Hz on order. Reading your post, maybe I should
consider either a 1.8 or a 2.1 kHz filter too.
7 matches
Mail list logo