I can't argue with you on that point Dave, you'd think that they'd drop it
from the exchange.
I find that irritating folks tends act like a feed line with a high SWR. The
energy I had wanted to radiate just comes back to source and produces
overheating and other unwanted side effects.
I do that
Not to mention the "standard" 559 stuff in the QRP contests!
72 / 73HankK8DD
At 11/9/2004 01:20 PM, David Pratt wrote:
While you're at it, Wayne, would it be possible to extract the signal
strength in reports directly from the S-meter reading? All this 599 stuff
in contests for every
On Nov 9, 2004, at 2:36 PM, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:
I used to give out "real" S-reports during contests. Too often that
confused
the other op who then asked for repeats. That slowed down the whole
exchange.
I finally defaulted to "599" even though the only contest contacts I
made
were entire
And I thought that "599" was just an official part of the exchange. :)
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:
I used to give out "real" S-reports during contests. Too often that confused
the other op who then asked for repeats. That slowed down the whole
exchange.
I finally defaulted to "
;t seem polite to confuse the other
guy going for the big score...
Ron AC7AC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Pratt
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 10:20 AM
To: wayne burdick
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Re: Re
While you're at it, Wayne, would it be possible to extract the signal
strength in reports directly from the S-meter reading? All this 599
stuff in contests for every QSO does annoy me!
73 de David G4DMP
In a recent message, wayne burdick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said
I've added this to the wi
6 matches
Mail list logo