RE: Re: [Elecraft] Microphones (was electronic product standards)

2008-02-14 Thread Brett Howard
an.qth.net Subject: Re: Re: [Elecraft] Microphones (was electronic product standards) > I've heard it said that some contest stations deliberately transmit > a wider-than-necessary signal to keep competitiors away from > "their" channel. I personally would not inte

Re: Re: [Elecraft] Microphones (was electronic product standards)

2008-02-14 Thread Mike S
At 08:28 AM 2/14/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote... This is why you want to have a signal with a very high average power level, but one which is also not wider than necessary. That sounds like CW. :-) ___ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft@mail

Re: Re: [Elecraft] Microphones (was electronic product standards)

2008-02-14 Thread dj7mgq
I've heard it said that some contest stations deliberately transmit a wider-than-necessary signal to keep competitiors away from "their" channel. I personally would not intentionally transmit a "wide" signal during a contest. It would, imho, be counterproductive, apart from any other re

Re: Re: [Elecraft] Microphones (was electronic product standards)

2008-02-14 Thread Thom LaCosta
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've heard it said that some contest stations deliberately transmit a wider-than-necessary signal to keep competitiors away from "their" channel. Ahmust be one of those "advance the technology" things that justify contestsgood for everyo

Re: Re: [Elecraft] Microphones (was electronic product standards)

2008-02-14 Thread d.cutter
> I've heard it said that some contest stations deliberately transmit a > wider-than-necessary signal to keep competitiors away from "their" channel. David G3UNA > > > > Within the context of SSB useage in ham radio I believe that the 'hype about > audio' could lead to another related proble