Nick-WA5BDU wrote:
Is the N1MM protocol for communicating with Winkey made public
anywhere? For us MCU programming CW enthusiasts?
As Simon says, it is actually Winkey's protocol for communicating with
any external application. Full details are given in the data sheets for
the Winkey 1 and
Thanks to all who pointed me to the info that I should have been able to
find myself. ;^)
And to K1EL for providing the nice documentation.
73--Nick, WA5BDU
Simon (HB9DRV) wrote:
The WinKey programming interface is available - see K1EL's website.
Simon (HB9DRV) wrote:
Agreed - unlike WinKey with KY you have no idea how many characters are
inside the radio waiting to be sent. It's OK for sending CQ DX ALL NIGHT
LONG etc. but for anything else it's not a good option.
I'm sorry, but I really don't get this argument in the context
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 - interfacing to N1MM Contest Logging software
Simon (HB9DRV) wrote:
Agreed - unlike WinKey with KY you have no idea how many characters are
inside the radio waiting to be sent. It's OK for sending CQ DX ALL NIGHT
LONG etc
Would you lop off the ? *after* clicking the button to start sending the
confirmation? If yes, then it would be a problem, because the software would
have sent the whole confirmation to the radio as soon as you clicked the
button. Otherwise it wouldn't.
Julian, G4ILO
G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com
No.
David
G3UNA
From: Julian G4ILO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/09/30 Tue AM 11:13:38 BST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: Re: [Elecraft] K3 - interfacing to N1MM Contest Logging software
Would you lop off the ? *after* clicking the button to start
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Julian, G4ILO
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 4:38 AM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 - interfacing to N1MM Contest
Logging software
Simon (HB9DRV) wrote
Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
You have obviously not used N1MM Logger or Writelog as the user can
edit calls or other information in the entry window and have the update
reflected in macros already in process.
The aim is to respond immediately to the station that has just called.
Both contesting
Is the N1MM protocol for communicating with Winkey made public
anywhere? For us MCU programming CW enthusiasts?
73--Nick, WA5BDU
That's correct - we have already passed the Point Of No Return on this
one. There is no point in software developers attempting to support
several fragmented
The WinKey programming interface is available - see K1EL's website.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
www.ham-radio-deluxe.com
- Original Message -
From: Nick-WA5BDU [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is the N1MM protocol for communicating with Winkey made public
anywhere? For us MCU programming CW enthusiasts?
*My* USB to serial adapter got partial gobbledygook back from the K3 when 2
stop bits were set in the software. In fact, I bought another one that had
exactly the same problem before discovering that setting the stop bits to 1
was the solution.
If yours works with 2 you've been lucky, but it
Barry Pfeil wrote:
ESCape key - In the configurer, N1MM says that ESC will not interrupt CW
keying via the radio communications port. But I'm using the DTR line on
the single RS232 interface for keying and ESC seems to instantly stop any
F key-initiated sending. Am I missing
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 09:35:11 -0700 (PDT), Guy, K2AV wrote:
Barry Pfeil wrote:
ESCape key - In the configurer, N1MM says that ESC will not interrupt CW
keying via the radio communications port. But I'm using the DTR line on
the single RS232 interface for keying and ESC seems to instantly
Jim Brown-10 wrote:
So as far as I can tell, it has NOTHING to do with the K3, and the
programmers should not need a K3 to solve the problem. They just need to
find
a better way for computers to generate CW. Since I'm not a programmer, I
have
no idea how much of a challenge that is.
- Original Message -
From: Joe Subich, W4TV [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It is the lack of Windows' ability to handle real-time events...
I really don't agree. There is no reason why a highly accurate background
thread cannot be implemented in a Windows NT-based system for sending CW
where
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 - interfacing to N1MM Contest
Logging software
Jim Brown-10 wrote:
So as far as I can tell, it has NOTHING to do with the K3, and the
programmers should not need a K3 to solve the problem. They
just need to
find
a better way
, September 29, 2008 4:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Julian, G4ILO';
elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 - interfacing to N1MM Contest
Logging software
- Original Message -
From: Joe Subich, W4TV [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It is the lack of Windows' ability to handle real-time
Barry,
I believe you are correct in your if it ain't broke, don't fix it
stance. Keep on keeping on!
However there are two things to be aware of in case of trouble down the
road.
1).Usually, USB to serial adapters work better at high speeds than low -
that is counterintuitive, but true.
18 matches
Mail list logo
