Re: [Elecraft] OT - Titanic II 2016 ...and CW?

2013-03-03 Thread Phil Kane
On 3/2/2013 8:35 PM, Kevin Luxford wrote: Perhaps people could write to Mr Palmer at his company, Mineralogy Pty Ltd using their website form at http://www.mineralogy.com.au/form.html urging the inclusion of a CW operator in the Titanic II ship's crew. The cost would be chickenfeed to

Re: [Elecraft] OT - Titanic II 2016 ...and CW?

2013-03-03 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
in the original Titanic ;-) 73 Ron AC7AC -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Phil Kane Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2013 10:13 AM To: Elecraft Subject: Re: [Elecraft] OT - Titanic II 2016 ...and CW? On 3/2/2013 8:35 PM, Kevin

Re: [Elecraft] OT - Titanic II 2016 ...and CW?

2013-03-02 Thread Rick Dettinger
Actually, it was spark that played a role, and we probably won't hear that from the Titanic II, since it hasn't been legal on the air since 1938. CW was still at least a decade off, though the date seems to be elusive. Spark was still the mode used in 1920 for ships at sea, as chronicled in

Re: [Elecraft] OT - Titanic II 2016 ...and CW?

2013-03-02 Thread stan levandowski
My own research done for a recent club presentation suggested that Spark was dead around 1920 for commercial purposes as a result of Lee DeForest's vacuum tube which ushered in the age of CW. I also found several references to spark having been outlawed for use on the ham bands in 1923-1924.

Re: [Elecraft] OT - Titanic II 2016 ...and CW?

2013-03-02 Thread Tony Estep
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 7:27 PM, stan levandowski sjl...@optonline.net wrote: ...the Titanic sent CQD and later SOS == I am no historian, but a Google search turns up many pages on this topic. Here's a typical one with its versions of the answers to questions of transmitter type and

Re: [Elecraft] OT - Titanic II 2016 ...and CW?

2013-03-02 Thread Tony Estep
And here's another with a small picture and many tech details. http://marconigraph.com/titanic/wireless/mgy_wireless.html BTW I have heard of Continental code but do not know how it differs from the Morse we use. Tony KT0NY -- http://www.isb.edu/faculty/facultydir.aspx?ddlFaculty=352

Re: [Elecraft] OT - Titanic II 2016 ...and CW?

2013-03-02 Thread stan levandowski
Tony, here is a link to an article and if you page down one or two pages, you'll see the three code variants all nicely lined up to compare. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morse_code 73, Stan WB2LQF On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Tony Estep wrote: BTW I have heard of Continental code but

Re: [Elecraft] OT - Titanic II 2016 ...and CW?

2013-03-02 Thread Kevin Luxford
For a bit more information on Titanic II, go to http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/clive-palmer-launches-titanic-plan/story-e6frg6so-1226586501589 Perhaps people could write to Mr Palmer at his company, Mineralogy Pty Ltd using their website form at