review in Radcom
To: elecraft elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Date: Friday, May 21, 2010, 9:49 PM
It seems as if Peter Hart, having pushed the K3 into second place after the
Perseus SDR (in his Radcom review a month ago) for close-in strong signal
performance (I was very surprised not to see that mentioned
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Hector Padron ad4c2...@yahoo.com wrote:
Third in place ??? I will not believe it until I see the performance reports
from Sherwood labs.
AD4C
Why not? I wouldn't be surprised to see incremental improvement in
this area, now that it is finally receiving the
...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] FT5000 review in Radcom
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Date: Saturday, May 22, 2010, 3:14 PM
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Hector Padron ad4c2...@yahoo.com wrote:
Third in place ??? I will not believe it until I see the performance reports
from Sherwood labs.
AD4C
--- On Sat, 5/22/10, Bob Cunnings bob.cunni...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Bob Cunnings bob.cunni...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] FT5000 review in Radcom
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Date: Saturday, May 22, 2010, 3:14 PM
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Hector Padron ad4c2
Hector, I would not get too excited about a few DBs on way or another. It is
just not going to make that much difference. Also, diversity receive with the
5000 is not going to work as well as in the K3.
The bothersome thing about the FT dx 5000 mp to me is the weight.another 52
I think the idea of competition is good for all so having Yaesu or Kenwood come
out with rigs that challenge Elecraft is a good thing.
However, in all this kind of talk I never see or hear of the best reason to go
with Elecraft -- at least from my own perspective. It is that these guys, Eric
--
Message: 22
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 22:49:39 +0100
From: Stephen Prior s...@sjprior.fsnet.co.uk
Subject: [Elecraft] FT5000 review in Radcom
To: elecraft elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Message-ID: c81cbe83.16c35%...@sjprior.fsnet.co.uk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
review in Radcom
To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Date: Saturday, May 22, 2010, 4:07 PM
Hector, I would not get too excited about a few DBs on way or another. It is
just not going to make that much difference. Also, diversity receive with
the 5000 is not going to work as well as in the K3
Toby Pennington wrote:
Strong points for the K3, lighter weight, easy to ship, repairs are not
expensive, and can be done in the field on occasion. Great
performance...also a great rig for portable operation.The only
negative is the user interface which is not really that great
It seems as if Peter Hart, having pushed the K3 into second place after the
Perseus SDR (in his Radcom review a month ago) for close-in strong signal
performance (I was very surprised not to see that mentioned in this forum),
has now pushed it one further place down, following his review of the
Stephen Prior wrote:
closer reading of the article reveals
criticism in other areas of the new radio's performance, for example the
frequency disparity between its dual receivers, and the resulting effect
on
diversity reception.
That's very interesting. I predicted this before units
11 matches
Mail list logo
