RE: [Elecraft] T1 Antenna Considerations

2006-05-06 Thread Thom R LaCosta
On Sat, 6 May 2006, Steve wrote: Thom, Sorry for the delay in reply. I'm catching up on a bunch of email from several email lists... The author advocates using a 1/4 wave (less 5%) as a counterpoise for this antenna. I agree: this does sound a lot like the W3EDP antenna, which is described i

RE: [Elecraft] T1 Antenna Considerations

2006-05-06 Thread Steve
Thom, Sorry for the delay in reply. I'm catching up on a bunch of email from several email lists... The author advocates using a 1/4 wave (less 5%) as a counterpoise for this antenna. I agree: this does sound a lot like the W3EDP antenna, which is described in "Practical Wire Antennas", pg 33

RE: [Elecraft] T1 Antenna Considerations

2006-04-28 Thread Thom R LaCosta
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006, Michael Babineau VE3WMB wrote: Steve Aa8af wrote : In the article "Taming the End-Fed Antenna" ("The Antenna File", RGSB, pg 118) he looked at this issue by plotting various 1/2 wave lengths and proposed the following end-fed wire lengths: - 26.5m (86.9 ft) for 160 - 10M

RE: [Elecraft] T1 Antenna Considerations

2006-01-06 Thread Thom R LaCosta
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006, Michael Babineau VE3WMB wrote: Steve Aa8af wrote : In the article "Taming the End-Fed Antenna" ("The Antenna File", RGSB, pg 118) he looked at this issue by plotting various 1/2 wave lengths and proposed the following end-fed wire lengths: - 26.5m (86.9 ft) for 160 - 10M

RE: [Elecraft] T1 Antenna Considerations

2006-01-06 Thread Michael Babineau VE3WMB
Steve Aa8af wrote : In the article "Taming the End-Fed Antenna" ("The Antenna File", RGSB, pg 118) he looked at this issue by plotting various 1/2 wave lengths and proposed the following end-fed wire lengths: - 26.5m (86.9 ft) for 160 - 10M use - 15m (49.2 ft) for 80, 40, 20, 17, 15, 12, 10M

RE: RE: [Elecraft] T1 Antenna Considerations

2006-01-06 Thread Peter Zenker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Gillen > Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 7:43 PM > To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: RE: [Elecraft] T1 Antenna Considerations > > Hi, Peter. > > Please excuse my ignorance I'm fairly new to amateur

RE: RE: [Elecraft] T1 Antenna Considerations

2006-01-06 Thread Peter Zenker
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron > D'Eau Claire > Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 8:19 PM > To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net > Subject: RE: RE: [Elecraft] T1 Antenna Considerations > > Martin wrote: > > "...another antenna I have used is a 66ft length of wire at > 1

RE: [Elecraft] T1 Antenna Considerations

2006-01-05 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
Steve AA8AF wrote: Alan Chester (G3CCB)(SK) proposed a solution for the high end impedance of a 1/2 wave antenna. Mr. Chester rationalized that there might be some impedance-friendly length of wire usable for an end-fed antenna that didn't present the tough-to-tune, high-impedance load on a selec

RE: [Elecraft] T1 Antenna Considerations

2006-01-05 Thread Steve
Mick, Alan Chester (G3CCB)(SK) proposed a solution for the high end impedance of a 1/2 wave antenna. Mr. Chester rationalized that there might be some impedance-friendly length of wire usable for an end-fed antenna that didn't present the tough-to-tune, high-impedance load on a select set of bands

Re: [Elecraft] T1 Antenna Considerations

2006-01-05 Thread Bob Nielsen
On Jan 5, 2006, at 10:43 AM, Martin Gillen wrote: Hi, Peter. Please excuse my ignorance I'm fairly new to amateur radio ;) But I have a question: The only reason that the "use the nearby bushes" construct now can be tuned by the T1 is that the impedance goes low because a part of the antenn

RE: RE: [Elecraft] T1 Antenna Considerations

2006-01-05 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
Martin wrote: "...another antenna I have used is a 66ft length of wire at 15feet, fed in the centre with 300 ohm twinlead. In this case, the driven half of the wire is still 33ft long - but I get really low SWR om 20m and have worked DX with it, So why does that work? Is the feedline doing some

Re: RE: [Elecraft] T1 Antenna Considerations

2006-01-05 Thread Martin Gillen
Hi, Peter. Please excuse my ignorance I'm fairly new to amateur radio ;) But I have a question: > The only reason that the "use the nearby bushes" > construct now can be tuned by the T1 is that the > impedance goes low because a part of the antenna is > lying "on the floor" now, giving high capa

RE: [Elecraft] T1 Antenna Considerations

2006-01-05 Thread Peter Zenker
Martin, > As previously stated a halfwave end fed wire represents a > very high impedance which is outside of the matching range of the T1. I agree, the impedance hight depends on the capacitive load of the wire ends against ground. > I have found that a halfwave long wire works as long as it is

Re: [Elecraft] T1 Antenna Considerations

2006-01-04 Thread Martin Gillen
Hi, Mick. > please can someone explain why this is important As previously stated a halfwave end fed wire represents a very high impedance which is outside of the matching range of the T1. But thats with no counterpoise or fed against a ground stake. I have found that a halfwave long wire works

Re: [Elecraft] T1 Antenna Considerations

2006-01-04 Thread Nigel A. Gunn G8IFF/KC8NHF
A half wavelength wire is very high impedance and outside the range of most auto tuners. If you're going to use half wave wires, feed them through a 9:1 current balun. (OK, it's not a balun, it's an impedance transformer) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello I have just received my T1 kit and i not