Mr Bolson,
this represents very well my comprehension.
IRV is better than FPTP and it is almost all about it. The more choices
there is,
the greater the difference gets.
Since the transfer of information from counted ballots can be done in
proportion of n!
datas (where n is the number of
Thank you! Shamos, while long, is well worth studying!
Are there any useful responses?
Which of the attempts you list at the end can legitimately claim to be
a step ahead?
DWK
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 19:50:17 -0400 Rick Carback wrote:
The problem with hand counting is that it is not always clear
1. Dopp wanted simple nonmonotone IRV elections examples.
See
http://rangevoting.org/Monotone.html
and here is another:
#voters Their Vote
8BAC
5CBA
4ACB
If two of the BAC voters change their vote to ABC, that causes
their true-favorite B to win under IRV.
(If they vote
