Thanks to Mike for adding some thought.
This subject is offering some thought toward Occupy getting something
workable in 2012 - a year in which new and usable thoughts are needed
quickly. One complication is that our target is composed of 50 states
with differing laws and differing collec
Mike asked ...
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> Forest?
>
>
>
>
>
> Could LRV, due to the bottom symmetrical completion,
> sometimes have an ABE-like problem, if the numbers were somewhat
> differentfrom those of the usual ABE? Could it have a co-
> operation/defection pro
Thanks for checking the details.
In traditional game theory the rational stratetgies are based on the assumption
of perfect knowledge, so
the A faction would know if the B faction was lying about its real preferences.
Even knowing that the
other faction knew that they were lying they could
Forest:
Thanks for the suggestion of MAMT.
MAMT is an addition to the list of FBC/ABE methods to choose from.
People should be looking into its properties.
Tell me what you know, so far, about its properties, and,
in particular, how its properties differ from those of ordinary MMT (MMT2).
I t
Dave:
You wrote;
If there is truth in what I read, the US desperately needs
better attention to public safety, including officers, and those
directing them, behaving better. The Occupy Movement needs to see
this as an important reason to see to such
[endquote]
Sure, but usually emotion
You're right. I've drawn out the game theory matrix and the honest outcome:
49 C
27 A>B
24 B>A
is indeed the stable one, with A winning.
So the only way for B to win is for his supporters to say they are
indifferent between A and C and threaten to bullet vote "B". Then the A
supporters fall for
I twice tried to post a message today. The first two trie only fractionally
posted.
On the 3rd try, I successfully posted the message.
So disregard the first two messages of mine entitled "Chris: MMT's strategy
incentives".
The two failed postings were do to "upgrades", one which I had no cho
Random fill:
First of all, here it isn’t random, for two reasons:
One: There is only one level of intermediate support. This
is a 3-slot method. So there’s no need for random choice of which
Intermediate position to give to a candidate.
Two: The matter of whom to middle-rate isn’
In other words, supporters of less popular candidates choose
to support and elect a more popular compromise.
If you know that your candidate is Plurality winner (and if
your only interest is electing hir), then you should middle-rate all of the
other candidates (at least the ones who aren’
In other words, supporters of less popular candidates choose
to support and elect a more popular compromise.
If you know that your candidate is Plurality winner (and if
your only interest is electing hir), then you should middle-rate all of the
other candidates (at least the ones who aren’t
10 matches
Mail list logo
