On 1/21/13 9:31 AM, Kathy Dopp wrote:
I do not spend enough time following this subject to memorize all the acronyms.
Could posters to this list please make your emails comprehensible to
someone like myself by spelling out the words comprising the acronym
when it is first used in each and every
EM's own web site is also a good source of definitions for abbreviations that
are often used in the EM discussions.
(http://wiki.electorama.com/wiki/Special:AllPages)
But in general I too recommend writers to open all abbreviations that are not
obvious to all. There is no point in making the
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Michael Ossipoff
email9648...@gmail.com wrote:
Elimination would start at the extremes. Transfers would be sent
inward, until the candidates adjacent to the CW would have collected
all of those inward-transferred votes, enough to eliminate the CW.
It seems more
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Raph Frank raph...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Michael Ossipoff
email9648...@gmail.com wrote:
Elimination would start at the extremes. Transfers would be sent
inward, until the candidates adjacent to the CW would have collected
all of
Richard says:
To Michael Ossipoff:
If you don't want to get hurt, then don't attack.
[endquote]
Excuse me? :-)
Did I complain that I'd gotten hurt?
I've been around Internet-abusers for a while. As I've mentioned
before, it was I who first suggested the formation of the
Single-Winner
