Satisfaction analysis should help answer your question
Diego Santos a écrit :
I was not enough clear when i wrote my previous email. The '' is not
a real approval mark on the ballot, it was only a satisfaction limit
from each voter. I am arguing that not always the Condorcet winner is
the
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:56:56 -0800 Jonathan Lundell wrote:
On Dec 13, 2007, at 6:52 PM, Dave Ketchum wrote:
Cycles don't enter into it (and if A is guaranteed a solid win,
then of course strategy is irrelevant).
My argument is about expected utility. Let's go back to Diego's
scenario:
On Dec 14, 2007, at 6:57 AM, Dave Ketchum wrote:
BECAUSE we are debating different elections. Lets think on what we
make of Diego's scenario:
I saw it as intelligent voting, but did not go back to create
utility numbers consistent with those decisions.
You came up with proposed
On Dec 13, 2007, at 6:52 PM, Dave Ketchum wrote:
Cycles don't enter into it (and if A is guaranteed a solid win,
then of course strategy is irrelevant).
My argument is about expected utility. Let's go back to Diego's
scenario:
46: A B C
5: B A C
5: B C A
44: C B A
Suppose
