Fred Gohlke wrote:
Good Afternoon, Kristofer
re: This sounds a lot like what I've previously referred to as
'council democracy'.
I hadn't heard that term before or seen the proposal. I wonder if the
concepts can be merged, perhaps by an analytical critique of the processes.
I first
Raph Frank wrote:
Sorry, pressed reply instead of reply to all
On 9/11/08, Aaron Armitage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It doesn't follow from the fact we choose representatives for ourselves
that we would lose nothing by being stripped of the means of political
action. We would lose our
Juho wrote:
The traditional algorithm complexity research covers usually only
finding perfect/optimal result. I'm particularly interested in how the
value of the result increases as a function of time. It is possible that
even if it would take 100 years to guarantee that one has found the best
Michael Allan wrote:
Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote:
If you take the parallel system strategy to its extreme, you'd get a
parallel organization where (as an example), a group elects a double
mayor and support him over the real mayor, essentially building a state
inside the state. I don't think
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Kristofer Munsterhjelm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A random assembly also resists the attack where one corrupts candidates,
simply because it's not clear who the candidates are going to be.
There is also the effect that a person who wants to be a candidate may
need
This is another for film ratings. It gives each moving a score and is
resistant to random raters.
http://www.mathaware.org/mam/08/reputation.pdf
Meant 'movie a score'
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
