On 06/08/2013 10:16 PM, Chris Benham wrote:
Yes.
Say there are three candidates: Right, Centre-Right and Left, and the
approval votes cast are
49: Right
21: Centre-Right (all prefer Right to Left)
23: Left
07: Left, Centre-Right (sincere favourite is Left)
Approval votes: Right 49, Left
At 02:46 AM 6/13/2013, Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote:
Finally, I'd like to say that I do understand that reality is a lot
less neat. What Abd says about differences in turnout in the first
and second rounds of a runoff means that criteria are not as useful
as for single-round methods because
Yes.
Say there are three candidates: Right, Centre-Right and Left, and the approval
votes cast are
49: Right
21: Centre-Right (all prefer Right to Left)
23: Left
07: Left, Centre-Right (sincere favourite is Left)
Approval votes: Right 49, Left 30, Centre-Right 28.
The top-2 runoff is between
Thanks to Chris for attempting this. This is a partisan election,
apparently, which is an issue in terms of whether or not scenarios
are realistic. But I'll set that aside for the moment.
At 03:16 PM 6/8/2013, Chris Benham wrote:
Yes.
Say there are three candidates: Right, Centre-Right and
At 10:51 AM 6/7/2013, Jameson Quinn wrote:
I'm sorry, I don't want to get into an interminable back and forth
with someone who misuses my name and doesn't apologize, and prefers
you didn't prove it! to working anything out for themselves or
asking nicely for evidence.
Jameson, I responded
Let's just drop this. You're technically wrong but substantially right, and
I don't see what's to be gained by convincing you of that that's worth the
time I think it would take.
As to the name thing, you called me James. No big deal, really. I made
the Joe joke, then you didn't realize what I
At 06:10 PM 6/7/2013, Jameson Quinn wrote:
Let's just drop this. You're technically wrong but substantially
right, and I don't see what's to be gained by convincing you of that
that's worth the time I think it would take.
As to the name thing, you called me James. No big deal, really. I
made
Subject was: Re: [EM] Someone thinks that Approval should meet the
Mutual Majority Criterion
At 01:56 PM 6/6/2013, Jameson Quinn wrote:
2013/6/6 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.coma...@lomaxdesign.com
Another issue that was left a bit hanging in discussions on the CES list:
Does
2013/6/6 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com
Subject was: Re: [EM] Someone thinks that Approval should meet the Mutual
Majority Criterion
At 01:56 PM 6/6/2013, Jameson Quinn wrote:
2013/6/6 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.coma**
b...@lomaxdesign.com a...@lomaxdesign.com
