I couldn't resist this and another. Silly time!
At 04:15 PM 1/16/2010, robert bristow-johnson wrote:
(I'd written previously)
no slip nor nuttin' else under me kilt. want me to show you?
You already did.
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
robert bristow-johnson wrote:
On Jan 16, 2010, at 5:02 PM, Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote:
robert bristow-johnson wrote:
On Jan 16, 2010, at 3:41 PM, Kathy Dopp wrote:
Exactly as I tried to point out to you, you were either disallowing
voters to rank only two candidates or to rank all
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 15:14:23 -0500
From: robert bristow-johnson r...@audioimagination.com
To: EM Methods election-methods@lists.electorama.com
Subject: Re: [EM] IRV vs Plurality (Dave Ketchum)
Don't know what you're talking about.
consider Burlington 2009 with the
On Jan 16, 2010, at 3:41 PM, Kathy Dopp wrote:
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 15:14:23 -0500
From: robert bristow-johnson r...@audioimagination.com
To: EM Methods election-methods@lists.electorama.com
Subject: Re: [EM] IRV vs Plurality (Dave Ketchum)
Don't know what you're talking about.
robert bristow-johnson wrote:
On Jan 16, 2010, at 3:41 PM, Kathy Dopp wrote:
Exactly as I tried to point out to you, you were either disallowing
voters to rank only two candidates or to rank all three.
no, it has nothing at all to do with allowing or disallowing the voters to
I see I
On Jan 16, 2010, at 5:02 PM, Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote:
robert bristow-johnson wrote:
On Jan 16, 2010, at 3:41 PM, Kathy Dopp wrote:
Exactly as I tried to point out to you, you were either disallowing
voters to rank only two candidates or to rank all three.
no, it has nothing at all to
