>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: RE: Instant Pairwise Elimination Runoff
I'm not simply bashing John Q. Voter about just
anything having to do with elections, but
specifically bashing him about the way he will
choose a new voting method. In the matter of how
the public makes decisions, I'm
I should have thought of that. Every method needs two names, one for
public consumption and one for scientific classification, like the latin
names for plants and animals.
I think the best one for public consumption would be "Instant Majority
Runoff" (IMR).
Forest
On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, Martin Ha
nah - an advertising agency would call it something like "Votex" or
"Democratum"... ;-) I still like "Instant Round Robin" for the
Condorcet-like methods, though.
Anthony Simmons wrote:
> >> Subject: [EM] A pairwise elimination satisfying
> >> SFC,SDSC
>
> >> INSTANT PAIRWISE ELIMINATION RUNOFF
>> Subject: [EM] A pairwise elimination satisfying
>> SFC,SDSC
>> INSTANT PAIRWISE ELIMINATION RUNOFF
I know this is going to sound really silly, but with
the majority of the electorate, the most important
factor is what it's called. "Intant Runoff" sounds
like it was chosen by an advertising a
