Is there an actual logical reason to rename Noise?
--
Jaap
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Victor Eduardo vic...@elementaryos.orgwrote:
Hi everybody,
many months ago we were discussing the possibility of renaming
Noisehttps://launchpad.net/noiseto something else. If I recall correctly,
I suppose it's because of the Noise-Beatbox issue.
El 19/11/2012 13:14, Jaap Broekhuizen jaap...@gmail.com escribió:
Is there an actual logical reason to rename Noise?
--
Jaap
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Victor Eduardo
vic...@elementaryos.orgwrote:
Hi everybody,
many months ago
2012/11/19 Jaap Broekhuizen jaap...@gmail.com:
Is there an actual logical reason to rename Noise?
Noise is perceived as something negative by many (the kind of people
who are not crazy about metal or industrial), that's it AFAIK.
--
Sergey Shnatsel Davidoff
OS architect @ elementary
--
What is many? Seems like a trivial thing to me...
--
Jaap
Sergey Shnatsel Davidoff ser...@elementaryos.orgschreef:
2012/11/19 Jaap Broekhuizen jaap...@gmail.com:
Is there an actual logical reason to rename Noise?
Noise is perceived as something negative by many (the kind of people
who are not
It's trivial to you because you know what Noise is. It's a media player,
you know it.
For people who don't, it's better if that name it is installed under in the
computer is Music Player or something like that. It's easier for most
people.
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Jaap Broekhuizen |
Don't we already present Noise in the OS as a music player? Doesn't the icon
have the purpose of showing the user what the app probably does?
IMO Noise relates more to music than Tempo does. Also, if we are going this
way with Noise because the name should directly show people what the app
I agree with Jaap and i'm against rename it...
Also i don't like Tempo, Noise is much better...
2012/11/19 Jaap Broekhuizen jaap...@gmail.com
Don't we already present Noise in the OS as a music player? Doesn't the
icon have the purpose of showing the user what the app probably does?
IMO
I also agree with Jaap. Both names are equal to me in communicational
value, so definitely not worth the effort and hassle.
On 11/19/2012 03:46 PM, Chris Triantafillis wrote:
I agree with Jaap and i'm against rename it...
Also i don't like Tempo, Noise is much better...
2012/11/19 Jaap
I also agree that Noise is an appropriate name for the player. I feel that this
naming scheme is most relevant to the player, as opposed to Tempo or some of
the others that have been mentioned. Noise seems more generic and
straight-forward as to what the app is meant to do.
On Mon, 19 Nov,
Okay, I disagree with you all then because in my language (french) there is two
way to pronounce that :
In french, and that word exists and means problems
In english, and that is really hard because there is an double voyel (no-ise)
so it's not that good for us.
I let the democracy choose, but
I understand the issue with the translation. From what I understand (as french
being my second language) the translation from Noise to french is Bruit. I'm
not sure if the application titles have been (or will be) translated, but if so
Bruit gives the same proper description of what Noise is in
I think that translating names would only make sense if the names were
like 'web browser, media player, and so on' else they are primary nouns
and so not translatable.
I think there is no gain in changing the name at this point, else then
showing project immaturity. At this point the name
Those are pretty much my thoughts as well.. I don't think renaming the app
for a third time would be productive at this point... It will probably just
lead to more confusion.
On Nov 19, 2012 11:57 AM, Darcy Brás da Silva dardeve...@cidadecool.com
wrote:
I think that translating names would only
I wouldn't call this a rename. The App name would be Noise, for all
effects, but it would be installed under the name of Media Player.
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Darcy Brás da Silva
dardeve...@cidadecool.com wrote:
I think that translating names would only make sense if the names were
David, if we did that with Noise, it should be done with every elementary
application.
El 19/11/2012 18:02, David Gomes da...@elementaryos.org escribió:
I wouldn't call this a rename. The App name would be Noise, for all
effects, but it would be installed under the name of Media Player.
On
I thought we were doing it already, what is Midori installed under?
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Alfredo Hernández
aldomann.desi...@gmail.com wrote:
David, if we did that with Noise, it should be done with every elementary
application.
El 19/11/2012 18:02, David Gomes
On Mon 19 Nov 2012 07:50:49 PM EET, Victor Eduardo wrote:
Thanks for your replies, I agree with most of the comments. Some
clarifications:
1. I'm not proposing Tempo as the new name. We'd still need to
evaluate alternatives. If it were my choice I would have re-named
the player to
Is geary going to have a Granite about dialog?
Also the geary ToolButtons in the toolbar all seem to be wider than those in
other apps, which breaks consistency.
Do we have the power to change these things before luna-beta2?
--
Jaap--
Mailing list:
@Victor +1
El 19/11/2012 19:42, xapantu xapa...@gmail.com escribió:
Le 19/11/2012 17:43, Benjamin VanMeggelen a écrit :
I understand the issue with the translation. From what I understand (as
french being my second language) the translation from Noise to french is
Bruit. I'm not sure if the
19 matches
Mail list logo