Hi Brian,
On Thu, 2024-04-04 at 16:31 +, Brian Cain wrote:
> > > ... implies a new EF_HEXAGON_TINY 0x8000 definition BTW.
> >
> > You obviously know this architecture better than me. But is the TINY
> > flag (bit 15) appropriate for all machines? It looks like it can only
> > be set on V67 an
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Wielaard
> Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2024 11:29 AM
> To: Brian Cain ; Matheus Bernardino (QUIC)
> ; elfutils-devel@sourceware.org
> Cc: Sid Manning ; Andrew Pinski (QUIC)
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Hexagon: implement machine
Hi,
On Tue, 2024-04-02 at 21:38 +, Brian Cain wrote:
> > diff --git a/backends/hexagon_symbol.c b/backends/hexagon_symbol.c
> > index b341243e..1e681e9f 100644
> > --- a/backends/hexagon_symbol.c
> > +++ b/backends/hexagon_symbol.c
> > @@ -56,3 +56,11 @@ hexagon_reloc_simple_type (Ebl *ebl __a
> -Original Message-
> From: Matheus Bernardino (QUIC)
> Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 2:56 PM
> To: elfutils-devel@sourceware.org
> Cc: Brian Cain ; Sid Manning ;
> m...@klomp.org; Andrew Pinski (QUIC) ;
> Matheus Bernardino (QUIC)
> Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] He
This fixes the "invalid machine flag" error from eu-elflint when passing
hexagon binaries.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Tavares Bernardino
---
backends/hexagon_init.c | 1 +
backends/hexagon_symbol.c | 8
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/backends/hexagon_init.c b/backends/hexa