I ultimately don't care if the name is "setup" or "build", but I do wonder
if compilation fits conceptually under the name "setup".
To expound on my original idea, I was thinking of having a command that I
would run both on the first pull, but also fairly regularly while working
on the
I just realised that for this alias:
setup: [“deps.get”, “app.start”]
Running:
$ iex -S mix setup
Just works™. Make of that what you will. :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"elixir-lang-core" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and
I'd be super ok with "mix setup" as a standard-ish name, to be clear. :) And I
think "mix setup" followed by "iex" or whatever would be good too.
> On 14 Jul 2023, at 11:43, Wojtek Mach wrote:
>
>
>> - People new to Elixir just checking out a project from source and trying to
>> see if it
In general, my happy place is a Makefile anyway. `make` ought to do what I
would want this for and is more flexible. t: am curmudgeon
On July 14, 2023 9:26:29 AM CDT, Jim Freeze wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 4:17 AM Christopher Keele
>wrote:
>
>> I think a standard `mix build` interface
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 4:17 AM Christopher Keele
wrote:
> I think a standard `mix build` interface would be most useful for:
>
> - People new to Elixir just checking out a project from source and trying
> to see if it compiles, using familiar semantics from other langs
> - People checking out a
> - People new to Elixir just checking out a project from source and trying to
> see if it compiles, using familiar semantics from other langs
I’d love to hear from actual users because to _me_ this feels like a bit of a
stretch. I think people don’t want to see whether something compiles,
> Not sure how useful build with compile is, if you run mix test instead of
mix compile, build won’t help it.
> Phoenix standardized on setup, but it does not include the compile
command.
I think a standard `mix build` interface would be most useful for:
- People new to Elixir just checking out
Phoenix standardized on setup, but it does not include the compile command.
Not sure how useful build with compile is, if you run mix test instead of
mix compile, build won’t help it.
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 09:11 Andrea Leopardi wrote:
> I personally like the idea of a mix build alias defined
I personally like the idea of a mix build alias defined by mix new. The reason
is that, while mix build is usually different for different projects, I like
the idea of standardizing on the terminology "build".
> On 13 Jul 2023, at 21:21, Jonathan Arnett wrote:
>
> I'm definitely open to
