I don't think we ever stored them in meta. But even if we did, we would
probably have done it in the formatter, and we should likely move it
somewhere public.
*José Valim*
www.plataformatec.com.br
Skype: jv.ptec
Founder and Director of R
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 8:37 PM, Louis Pilfold
wrote:
Yes being part of the metadata would be great. Need to look around/research
and see what other people have done. Just not losing the data would be great.
> On Sep 17, 2018, at 12:10, José Valim wrote:
>
> I don't think we ever stored them in meta. But even if we did, we would
> probably
In addition, clang and a few other compilers I've worked with also all
'carry' comments in some form (either as their own syntactical node or as
metadata on another node), so there is massive precedence.
On Monday, September 17, 2018 at 11:28:11 AM UTC-6, OvermindDL1 wrote:
>
> Comments are
Hey
I'm a little out of touch with this area, but isn't this what we previously
did? I remember comments being stored in meta during the creation of the
formatter. Or did I make that up?
Cheers,
Louis
On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 at 19:17 José Valim
wrote:
> I like the metadata idea a lot, thanks. We
Comments are part of the syntax and should be parsed as such however.
Personally I'd opt for an OCaml-style handling of comments where the
comments get turned into a meta attribute on the related tag, which for
elixir could be as simple as wrapping the related comment part in something
like
Hello,
I was thinking to create a system which let me to plug some functionalities
in future like ejabberd or MongooseIM does with hooks:
https://github.com/benoitc/hooks
The point is, if I have a dynamic pipeline created to process sequentially
data, let me to include in that pipeline new code
Hey Manuel,
the elixir-lang-core mailing list is reserved for discussions on the
language and on language features. For example, you would write here if you
had a proposal for a new feature to add to Elixir. This is outlined in this
page: https://elixir-lang.org/development.html.
I think your
