Re: [elm-discuss] Re: Is Elm going stale?

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 8:50 PM, Brian Hicks wrote: > > Even if the language were not being actively developed (which it is) the > community is thriving and I would hope makes the investment in using the > language worthwhile. :) > If one learns a language for some toy

Re: [elm-discuss] Re: Is Elm going stale?

The roadmap is still accurate. Evan talked about this at elm-conf, and we will be releasing the video with 0.19 (it goes into a lot of "why?" and mirrors the roadmap nicely.) I can't speak to major language features, but Evan is still working on Elm full-time. The language is alive and

[elm-discuss] Re: Is Elm going stale?

Is the roadmap reliable though?. It states that the major focus of 0.19 will be single-page apps, and that features such as server-side rendering, tree shaking, code splitting, and lazy loading may be introduced. However, a status update was posted in elm-dev in July

[elm-discuss] Re: Is Elm going stale?

There are a lot of answers to that question here: https://github.com/elm-lang/projects/blob/master/roadmap.md Even if the language were not being actively developed (which it is) the community is thriving and I would hope makes the investment in using the language worthwhile. :) On Thursday,