On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 at 8:43:27 AM UTC-6, Joey Eremondi wrote:
>
> It's also worth mentioning that first class modules are a decent
> replacement for type classes.
>
That is precisely the main reason that I am wanting them. ^.^
Although in that case having OCaml'ish Class
It's also worth mentioning that first class modules are a decent
replacement for type classes.
On Sep 13, 2016 7:28 AM, "OvermindDL1" wrote:
> It seems you are wanting something like OCaml has, first-class modules
> that can be passed around like types and data like OCaml
It seems you are wanting something like OCaml has, first-class modules that
can be passed around like types and data like OCaml does it?
I would love that and it would fix a lot of the verbosity I have.
On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 at 1:23:55 AM UTC-6, Charles-Edouard Cady
wrote:
>
> Would