hDate:
>
> compare : Date -> Foo -> Bool
> compare .
>
> filterFoos : List Foo -> Date -> List Foo
> filterFoos foos date =
>let
> compareWithDate = compare date
>in
> List.filter compareWithDate foos
>
>
> On Tue, 22 Nov 2016
Sorry, I'm still not sure how to pass a received date or model to
comparison function.
On Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 3:41:07 AM UTC+1, Max Goldstein wrote:
>
> You can partially apply the comparison function to the current date before
> passing it to List.filter. The trick is that you have
But how then to pull current date in the functions where it could not be
passed? For example I want to List.filter comparing to current date but I
can not pass additional parameters to comparison function.
On Monday, November 21, 2016 at 8:33:55 PM UTC+1, Tim Bezhashvyly wrote:
>
> Makes
d also break reproduceability). By making it
> an effect it can just return a request to get the actual date.
>
>
> On Monday, November 21, 2016 at 12:29:09 PM UTC-7, Tim Bezhashvyly wrote:
>>
>> Sorry for starting it again but do I really need to do Task.perform just
>> t
Sorry for starting it again but do I really need to do Task.perform just to
print current year just once? "Date.year Date.now" doesn't work as Date.now
returns Task.Task x Date.Date.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm
Discuss" group.
To
In any case, if you want to render a google map on button click, the setup
could be:
>
>- add a Msg called LoadButtonClicked or something, and add a button in
>your view which triggers this (with onClick)
>- in your update function, add a handler for LoadButtonClicked that
>
Let's say I want to render a Google Map on a button click.
To do so I first need to render a markup and then send a message which will
trigger JavaScript through post with map data.
With "init" it would not be a problem as command passed to "init" is
executed after view is already there. But
https://stackoverflow.com/jobs
On Sunday, July 31, 2016 at 1:34:40 PM UTC+2, Andre Bolle wrote:
>
> Is there a place where people can advertise and look for Elm jobs?
>
> Andre
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm
Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe
me but I'm wondering if it is possible to capture root array
node.
On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 10:16:12 PM UTC+1, Peter Damoc wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:50 PM, Tim Bezhashvyly <tim.bez...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Makes sense but doesn't change much:
&
shows.json" decoderColl
> |> Http.send handleRequest
>
> And second, you need a full URL for the "shows.json" not just a file name.
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:26 PM, Tim Bezhashvyly <tim.bez...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Here
moving Http.toTask as that is not needed at all
> there.
>
> triggerReadingFromJson =
> Http.get "shows.json" decoderColl
> |> Http.send handleRequest
>
> And second, you need a full URL for the "shows.json" not just a file name.
>
>
>
>
signatures, in
> order for me to try to understand why do you get that specific compiler
> error.
>
> What I provided has only two lines and should have worked (in theory).
> If you have altered it in a way that somehow reintroduces Tasks back, I
> need to see some code i
for trowing just an exception message but I'm really not sure how to
proceed here. :(
And thank you for all your support so far.
On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 8:25:23 PM UTC+1, Peter Damoc wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 8:19 PM, Tim Bezhashvyly <tim.bez...@gmail.com
do
with it? I need somehow cast it to either MyType or Cmd, right?
On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 3:23:13 PM UTC+1, Peter Damoc wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Tim Bezhashvyly <tim.bez...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Chained to Task.andThen and Task.onErro
u don't need Task.attempt. Just use
> the regular Http.get and use the Cmds produced by it.
>
> If you need chaining, there is a `toTask` function that converts Requests
> to Tasks
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Tim Bezhashvyly <tim.bez...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
&g
RequestTask
>
> Alternatively, you could just have only one message that takes a Result
> and handle each case in that message's part of the update as demonstrated
> by the Http example:
> http://elm-lang.org/examples/http
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 3:05 PM, T
2016 at 3:50:36 PM UTC-7, Tim Bezhashvyly wrote:
>>
>> Thank you. Tried to apply it but my problem is that I'm trying to send
>> initialize a request on init:
>>
>> init : ( Model, Cmd Msg )
>> init =
>> ( {
>> -- my model here
>> }
>>
at the old
> CounterPair example:
>
> https://github.com/pdamoc/elm-architecture-tutorial/blob/master/examples/2/CounterPair.elm
>
> Please note that this code is obsolete.
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Tim Bezhashvyly <tim.bez...@gmail.com
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
