Brilliant, thanks!
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 8:06 PM Janis Voigtländer <
janis.voigtlaen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The function from that thread exists as
> http://package.elm-lang.org/packages/NoRedInk/elm-task-extra/2.0.0/Task-Extra#performFailproof
>
>
>
> Am 15.10.2016 um 19:39 schrieb Austin Bing
The function from that thread exists as
http://package.elm-lang.org/packages/NoRedInk/elm-task-extra/2.0.0/Task-Extra#performFailproof
> Am 15.10.2016 um 19:39 schrieb Austin Bingham :
>
> I've got a situation where I've got task that will always succeed, and I want
> to know the best practic
I've got a situation where I've got task that will always succeed, and I
want to know the best practice for using it with Task.perform.
The task itself is a Task.sequence of tasks that may individually fail, and
I want to report the result - success or failure - for each of them. So
there's no
