Stefan Monnier wrote on 18 Mar 2005 14:58:48 +0100:
> Huh? I'd never have expected someone to actually suggest an interactive key
> binding for goto-char. But I now see that it even has a menu-bar entry.
> What in the world for?
Some compilers (eg ocaml) reports errors with character numbers i
>> M-g c - goto-char
Huh? I'd never have expected someone to actually suggest an interactive key
binding for goto-char. But I now see that it even has a menu-bar entry.
What in the world for?
I also see that the docstring of goto-char is wrong. How about the
patch below?
> M-g b - go
Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> M-g n - next-error (goto-next-locus)
>>> M-g M-n - next-error (goto-next-locus)
>>> M-g p - previous-error
>>> M-g M-p - previous-error
>
>> Most definitely YES!
>
> I would also like to see
David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> M-g n - next-error (goto-next-locus)
>> M-g M-n - next-error (goto-next-locus)
>> M-g p - previous-error
>> M-g M-p - previous-error
> Most definitely YES!
I would also like to see `first-error' there while we're at it. So how
about:
M-g
Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Juri Linkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I see `goto-line' finally bound to M-g in CVS. Good news!
>> After such a big change, it is time now for a few improvements.
Of course Juri is being facetious. The binding of M-g was a small
change as co
