`sit-for' has an argument old-nodisp that is not described in the doc
string.
We often don't document an argument that we don't encourage people to
use.
___
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ema
Juanma Barranquero wrote:
On 7/31/05, Lennart Borgman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just meant that the old declaration could perhaps be an implicit
description.
I don't understand.
Just say what changes would you do to the docstring, and if they're
good, by all means commit them.
I
On 7/31/05, Lennart Borgman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just meant that the old declaration could perhaps be an implicit
> description.
I don't understand.
Just say what changes would you do to the docstring, and if they're
good, by all means commit them.
--
/L/e/k/t/u
On 7/31/05, Lennart Borgman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks, I did see that (though I am a lousy reader) but OLD-NODISP is
> still not mentioned.
It is not mentioned because it is not OLD-NODISP. It is NODISP, when
using the old profile.
> An easy way to fix this particular problem would
> p
Juanma Barranquero wrote:
An easy way to fix this particular problem would
perhaps be to just change the description of the old format (since that
is just a part of the doc string I assume):
- (old): (sit-for SECONDS &optional MILLISECONDS OLD-NODISP)
That would not help argument highli
Juanma Barranquero wrote:
`sit-for' has an argument old-nodisp that is not described in the doc
string.
Not exactly. If you read it again carefully, you'll notice `sit-for'
has two modes of invocation:
- (modern): (sit-for SECONDS &optional NODISP)
- (old): (sit-for SECONDS &optional
> `sit-for' has an argument old-nodisp that is not described in the doc
> string.
Not exactly. If you read it again carefully, you'll notice `sit-for'
has two modes of invocation:
- (modern): (sit-for SECONDS &optional NODISP)
- (old): (sit-for SECONDS &optional MILLISECONDS NODISP)
So the
