Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords

2011-10-21 Thread Christian Moe
I disagree with Tom on [1]: it should clearly be srcname, in analogy to #+tblname - and also so I don't have to change my files :-} (but see my question about tblname below). I'll have to change my files, either way. The price one pays for inconsistency. But as I've recently learned from

Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines

2011-10-21 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hi Eric and Nick, Eric Schulte wrote: Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com writes: Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com wrote: Other than colon confusion (having to specify ``:results silent'' on the src block header line and ``results silent'' in the #+PROPERTY line to get the same

Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords

2011-10-21 Thread Torsten Wagner
Hi, Ideally if we limit each of the above to only one alternative we could simplify the specification of code blocks in Org-mode making them easier to learn and use and removing some of the mystery around their syntax. What does everyone think? Just to make it as easy as possible for

Re: [O] org-contacts or bbdb?

2011-10-21 Thread henry atting
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes: pmli...@free.fr (Peter Münster) writes: Hello, I would like to manage my contacts, so that I can - easily search them - add new email addresses from gnus (summary buffer) - complete email addresses in gnus (message buffer and prompts in mini-buffer) - and

Re: [O] Patch for bug in adjusting time ranges in Agenda

2011-10-21 Thread Carsten Dominik
I have just checked in a slightly modified patch. Thanks, this was really a bug. - Carsten On Oct 17, 2011, at 10:50 AM, Niels Giesen wrote: On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com wrote: Niels Giesen niels.gie...@gmail.com wrote: *bump* Has this one

[O] [Accepted] Check marker is valid before use

2011-10-21 Thread Carsten Dominik
Patch 994 (http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/994/) is now Accepted. Maintainer comment: none This relates to the following submission: http://mid.gmane.org/%3Cm1ipnj8mj4.fsf%40gmail.com%3E Here is the original message containing the patch: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines

2011-10-21 Thread Christian Moe
Hi again, I can quickly think of two advantages of the late lamented (if only by me) #+BABEL header over using properties. 1. Allowing you to specify multiple buffer-wide options on the same line (keeping things short), in the same colon :syntax as used in a src block header (keeping things

Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords

2011-10-21 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hi Nick, Tom, Eric and all, Nick Dokos wrote: Thomas S. Dye t...@tsdye.com wrote: Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes: [1] I have the same annoying feelings with #+SOURCE, #+SRCNAME, #+FUNCTION, #+CALL, #+LOB, and SBE, some of which are interchangeable; some not. I'd prefer

Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords

2011-10-21 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hi Torsten, Torsten Wagner wrote: I tend to #+results: because it fits more to the entire babel syntax. However, earlier on the mailing list people were pointing out that one is going to change results for a unknown source block (that was the reason data was introduced) and I think this

Re: [O] Asciidoc

2011-10-21 Thread Christian Egli
Hi Stephen Nelson-Smith sanel...@gmail.com writes: I have a large piece of writing to do, which my publisher wants in asciidoc. I'd prefer to write in orgmode and export as asciidoc. I used to use asciidoc but much prefer orgmode now. Is this feasible? Anyone doing this or done this

Re: [O] Patch for bug in adjusting time ranges in Agenda

2011-10-21 Thread Christian Egli
Hi Carsten Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: I have just checked in a slightly modified patch. I think there is a problem with this checkin. The variable org-agenda-move-date-from-past-immediately-to-today is not defined. Should this be a defcustom somewhere? Debugger

Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines

2011-10-21 Thread Rainer M Krug
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Christian Moe m...@christianmoe.comwrote: Hi again, I can quickly think of two advantages of the late lamented (if only by me) #+BABEL header over using properties. I also think that keeping the #+BABEL would be a good idea, as it keeps the options for

Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines

2011-10-21 Thread Christian Moe
On 10/21/11 11:12 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote: On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Christian Moe m...@christianmoe.com mailto:m...@christianmoe.com wrote: (...) 2. Allowing you to pass multiple buffer-wide arguments with :var. This could make a substantive difference in some applications.

Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines

2011-10-21 Thread Rainer M Krug
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Christian Moe m...@christianmoe.comwrote: On 10/21/11 11:12 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote: On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Christian Moe m...@christianmoe.com mailto:m...@christianmoe.com** wrote: (...) 2. Allowing you to pass multiple buffer-wide

Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines

2011-10-21 Thread Christian Moe
On 10/21/11 12:59 PM, Rainer M Krug wrote: So, using your above mentioned example, after the first PROPERTY line, euro=1.3795 and SALESTAX not set, while after the second one salestax=.15, and euro is unset? That would be quite bad. That's what I'd expected, but actually, euro is set and

Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines

2011-10-21 Thread Rainer M Krug
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Christian Moe m...@christianmoe.comwrote: On 10/21/11 12:59 PM, Rainer M Krug wrote: So, using your above mentioned example, after the first PROPERTY line, euro=1.3795 and SALESTAX not set, while after the second one salestax=.15, and euro is unset? That

Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords

2011-10-21 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes: There are currently a number of instances of synonymous keywords when dealing with code blocks, specifically. named code blocks [1] -- source srcname function calling external functions [2] -- call lob named data

[O] Cannot display images inline any more

2011-10-21 Thread Rainer Stengele
Hi all, I am no more able to display images inline. I was able when I used Emacs-23-CvsP091103-EmacsW32-1.58.exe. I have for example [[file:c:/img.jpg]] which is exported correctly as html. In Emacs, after C-c C-x v Org says: No images to display inline. Does anybody use Emacs 24.0.90.1 and

Re: [O] Cannot display images inline any more

2011-10-21 Thread suvayu ali
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Rainer Stengele rainer.steng...@online.de wrote: I have for example [[file:c:/img.jpg]] which is exported correctly as html. In Emacs, after C-c C-x v Org says: No images to display inline. Does anybody use Emacs 24.0.90.1 and is able to display images

Re: [O] Cannot display images inline any more

2011-10-21 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hi Suvayu and Rainer, suvayu ali wrote: On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Rainer Stengele rainer.steng...@online.de wrote: I have for example [[file:c:/img.jpg]] which is exported correctly as html. In Emacs, after C-c C-x v Org says: No images to display inline. Does anybody use Emacs

Re: [O] Cannot display images inline any more

2011-10-21 Thread Rainer Stengele
Am 21.10.2011 15:33, schrieb Sebastien Vauban: Hi Suvayu and Rainer, suvayu ali wrote: On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Rainer Stengele rainer.steng...@online.de wrote: I have for example [[file:c:/img.jpg]] which is exported correctly as html. In Emacs, after C-c C-x v Org says: No

Re: [O] Cannot display images inline any more

2011-10-21 Thread Jambunathan K
Rainer Stengele rainer.steng...@online.de writes: Am 21.10.2011 15:33, schrieb Sebastien Vauban: Hi Suvayu and Rainer, suvayu ali wrote: On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Rainer Stengele rainer.steng...@online.de wrote: I have for example [[file:c:/img.jpg]] which is exported

Re: [O] Cannot display images inline any more

2011-10-21 Thread Jambunathan K
Well, who is telling me No images to display inline? Is it Emacs or Org? Should be straight-forward right? How about C-x C-f image.file? --

Re: [O] Cannot display images inline any more

2011-10-21 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Oct 21, 2011, at 4:00 PM, Rainer Stengele wrote: Am 21.10.2011 15:33, schrieb Sebastien Vauban: Hi Suvayu and Rainer, suvayu ali wrote: On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Rainer Stengele rainer.steng...@online.de wrote: I have for example [[file:c:/img.jpg]] which is exported

Re: [O] git describe in version of info file with make info_git_describe

2011-10-21 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi, is there an agreement that this is a good patch? I have not followed the discussion. - Carsten On Oct 16, 2011, at 9:12 PM, Michael Brand wrote: Hi all I made a new patch replacing the previous, now considering the Makefile targets target and help introduced meanwhile by Achim

Re: [O] outline-demote incorrectly demotes leaf nodes

2011-10-21 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Oct 19, 2011, at 5:39 PM, Michael Brand wrote: Hi Carsten On 18.10.2011, at 20:03, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote: I do worry about one point, namely that C-c C- (outline-demote) should still work. And it does work in regular outline mode. For example, if I rename my test file to c.otl and

Re: [O] Cannot display images inline any more = solved

2011-10-21 Thread Rainer Stengele
Am 21.10.2011 16:19, schrieb Jambunathan K: Rainer Stengele rainer.steng...@online.de writes: Am 21.10.2011 15:33, schrieb Sebastien Vauban: Hi Suvayu and Rainer, suvayu ali wrote: On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Rainer Stengele rainer.steng...@online.de wrote: I have for example

Re: [O] outline-demote incorrectly demotes leaf nodes

2011-10-21 Thread Bastien
Hi Michael, Michael Brand michael.ch.br...@gmail.com writes: My suggestion is something like (define-key org-mode-map [remap outline-promote] 'org-promote-subtree) (define-key org-mode-map [remap outline-demote] 'org-demote-subtree) I've taken this road and committed the change, thanks for

Re: [O] Can't use char in TODO state

2011-10-21 Thread Bastien
Hi Sébastien, Sebastien Vauban wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com writes: I find this behavior not entirely satisfying, even if I can fully accept that is a forbidden character in the TODO states. For example, we could think of a warning being generated, or of the state being fully ignored, or ...

Re: [O] property values and timestamps

2011-10-21 Thread Bastien
Hi Skip and Nick, Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com writes: Still a proof-of-concept, but better than the first attempt - set recursive minibuffers locally and use the standard keybinding: (defun org-completing-read (rest args) Completing-read with SPACE being a normal character. (let

Re: [O] org-bibtex org-exp-bibtex tutorial and config needed

2011-10-21 Thread Bastien
Hi Ezequiel, Ezequiel Birman stormwa...@espiga4.com.ar writes: I am trying to get the most of org-bibtex and org-exp-bibtex. Could anybody describe briefly his configuration and workflow? Especially with regards to reftex. What tutorial did you already check? That will help people

Re: [O] Can't use char in TODO state

2011-10-21 Thread Bastien
Hi, Michael Brand michael.ch.br...@gmail.com writes: It works with this patch http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/964 from Nicolas which I am still using to test it. Has anyone else been using this patch without problems? If so, then Nicolas please apply it. It really simplifies the way

Re: [O] property values and timestamps

2011-10-21 Thread Bastien
Hi Skip, Skip Collins skip.coll...@gmail.com writes: Still a proof-of-concept, but better than the first attempt - set recursive minibuffers locally and use the standard keybinding: That was easy. I'm looking forward to this making its way into the main repository. Where else would a

Re: [O] outline-demote incorrectly demotes leaf nodes

2011-10-21 Thread Bastien
Hi Carsten, Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: permanently built into Org mode (not in org-mode-hook) for these and maybe even a few more outline-* bindings to get the incompatible outline-* bindings out of the way from within Org mode. This remap does not affect the

Re: [O] git describe in version of info file with make info_git_describe

2011-10-21 Thread Bernt Hansen
I still have this as a TODO item for review. I'll take a look at it this weekend. -Bernt Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: Hi, is there an agreement that this is a good patch? I have not followed the discussion. - Carsten On Oct 16, 2011, at 9:12 PM, Michael Brand

Re: [O] No updates on git server?

2011-10-21 Thread Bastien
Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com writes: [...] or has org reached a stable state? Is it April fools' day already? :) -- Bastien

[O] [PATCH 1/5] bind org-export-current-backend in generic exporter.

2011-10-21 Thread Robert P. Goldman
This is needed for org-export-preprocess-string to function correctly. --- contrib/lisp/org-export-generic.el |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/contrib/lisp/org-export-generic.el b/contrib/lisp/org-export-generic.el index bb42b60..29e90b8 100644 ---

[O] Patches for org-generic-export

2011-10-21 Thread Robert P. Goldman
Attached is a set of patches to the org-generic-exporter. They fix a change in the org-preprocess process that means that all uses of the org-generic export facility will crash. They also add rudimentary support for trac wiki and tikiwiki export. Finally, I have removed the HTML exporter from

[O] [PATCH 4/5] Fixed section-header-prefix for trac wiki.

2011-10-21 Thread Robert P. Goldman
--- contrib/lisp/org-export-generic.el |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/contrib/lisp/org-export-generic.el b/contrib/lisp/org-export-generic.el index 15afe6a..5a5af14 100644 --- a/contrib/lisp/org-export-generic.el +++

[O] [PATCH 5/5] Fix header prefixes for trac wiki.

2011-10-21 Thread Robert P. Goldman
trac wiki has hard limit on number of headers. Need space before macro characters in trac wiki. Add a couple of TODO comments. --- contrib/lisp/org-export-generic.el |6 -- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/contrib/lisp/org-export-generic.el

[O] [PATCH 2/5] Added trac-wiki and tikiwiki export settings.

2011-10-21 Thread Robert P. Goldman
--- contrib/lisp/org-export-generic.el | 107 +++- 1 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/contrib/lisp/org-export-generic.el b/contrib/lisp/org-export-generic.el index 29e90b8..e3a8680 100644 --- a/contrib/lisp/org-export-generic.el +++

Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords

2011-10-21 Thread Eric Schulte
I disagree with Tom on [1]: it should clearly be srcname, in analogy to #+tblname - and also so I don't have to change my files :-} (but see my question about tblname below). I agree on [2] call. noted I'm confused by [3] so I will say nothing for now, except to ask some questions: are

Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords

2011-10-21 Thread Eric Schulte
t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes: [1] I have the same annoying feelings with #+SOURCE, #+SRCNAME, #+FUNCTION, #+CALL, #+LOB, and SBE, some of which are interchangeable; some not. I'd prefer deprecating an old form when a better one is

Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords

2011-10-21 Thread Eric Schulte
I'm confused by [3] so I will say nothing for now, except to ask some questions: are we talking about what a human would use to label a piece of data for consumption by a block (including perhaps the future possibilities of lists and paragraphs that Tom brought up)? what babel would use to

Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords

2011-10-21 Thread Eric Schulte
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes: Hello, Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes: There are currently a number of instances of synonymous keywords when dealing with code blocks, specifically. named code blocks [1] -- source srcname function calling external

Re: [O] Include does not work when doing org-export-as-org

2011-10-21 Thread Bastien
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: You are welcome - and I think it might be good in integrate Nicks function into Org and make it available through the menu or a key. Indeed -- IIRC the problem is that Nick cannot submit non-tiny patches :( I added Nick's code to

Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords

2011-10-21 Thread Eric Schulte
Now, between srcname and source: I'm used to whatever my Yasnippet is entering for me. That's currently srcname. I don't have a strong opinion, though, to choose one over the other, except that I like Nick's argument with the table analogy. I agree on [2] call. I clearly agree on call as

Re: [O] org-contacts or bbdb?

2011-10-21 Thread Wes Hardaker
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 10:21:11 +0800, Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net said: EA As Rasmus mentioned, if you use BBDB you should get version 3, it's EA significantly better than the previous version. There's a slow movement EA towards better import/export functions, which I think has been

Re: [O] OPatches for org-generic-export

2011-10-21 Thread Wes Hardaker
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:13:24 -0500, Robert P. Goldman rpgold...@real-time.com said: RPG Attached is a set of patches to the org-generic-exporter. They fix RPG a change in the org-preprocess process that means that all uses of RPG the org-generic export facility will crash. They also add RPG

Re: [O] Private flag or property

2011-10-21 Thread Eric S Fraga
Karl Voit devn...@karl-voit.at writes: Hi! I am still in the process of converting (lots!) of old data into Org-mode format. I stumbled over a private-flag PalmOS datebook used to maintain. Is there a *common* way of expressing a private flag/property yet? Not that I know of. Or is

[O] [PATCH 3/5] Kill the HTML exporter.

2011-10-21 Thread Robert P. Goldman
This is done better in core org-mode. --- contrib/lisp/org-export-generic.el | 41 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/contrib/lisp/org-export-generic.el b/contrib/lisp/org-export-generic.el index e3a8680..15afe6a 100644 ---

Re: [O] OPatches for org-generic-export

2011-10-21 Thread Bastien
Hi Wes, Wes Hardaker wjhns...@hardakers.net writes: RPG Attached is a set of patches to the org-generic-exporter. They fix RPG a change in the org-preprocess process that means that all uses of RPG the org-generic export facility will crash. They also add RPG rudimentary support for trac

Re: [O] Exporting selected tasks (maybe from agenda view) including their body.

2011-10-21 Thread Bastien
Hi Dominik, Dominik Schrempf dominik.schre...@gmail.com writes: Is there a possibility to export tasks including their body (text, maybe logbook etc.) from the agenda view? Nope. What I would like to do is the following: I have Tasks with a certain todo state (e.g. WAITING). I can view all

Re: [O] org-protocol and new frames

2011-10-21 Thread Bastien
Hi Tom, Tom Prince tom.pri...@ualberta.net writes: Is there any way to get org-protocol to create a new frame, when it needs to open a buffer, but otherwise not open one. Can you give a more detailed example? What does your Org protocol look like? Thanks, -- Bastien

Re: [O] OPatches for org-generic-export

2011-10-21 Thread Robert Goldman
On 10/21/11 Oct 21 -12:06 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote: On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:13:24 -0500, Robert P. Goldman rpgold...@real-time.com said: RPG Attached is a set of patches to the org-generic-exporter. They fix RPG a change in the org-preprocess process that means that all uses of RPG the

Re: [O] Links to C/C++ source code lines

2011-10-21 Thread Bastien
Hi Rafal, Rafal raf...@interia.pl writes: I wrote a small hook for creating org-mode links to C/C++ source code lines in the form of a regexp so the links stay valid even if the source code changes eg. a source line while(ptr ptr_end) has a link

Re: [O] OPatches for org-generic-export

2011-10-21 Thread Jambunathan K
I think also we should try to assemble a single org document with all kinds of markup that are expected to work, and use that to make tests. An export facility is actually easy to regression test I just haven't gotten around to it. Do you know if there is such a document for one of the

Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines

2011-10-21 Thread Eric Schulte
Christian Moe m...@christianmoe.com writes: Hi again, I can quickly think of two advantages of the late lamented (if only by me) #+BABEL header over using properties. 1. Allowing you to specify multiple buffer-wide options on the same line (keeping things short), in the same colon

Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords

2011-10-21 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hi Eric, Eric Schulte wrote: Now, between srcname and source: I'm used to whatever my Yasnippet is entering for me. That's currently srcname. I don't have a strong opinion, though, to choose one over the other, except that I like Nick's argument with the table analogy. I agree on [2] call.

Re: [O] org-mac-protocol no remember window and Symbol's function definition is void: caddr from emacs server

2011-10-21 Thread Bastien
Hi David, David Abernethy david.aberne...@clear.net.nz writes: Waiting for Emacs... *ERROR*: Symbol's function definition is void: caddr That's quite weird. Can anyone spot the cause of the problem please? Sorry, I cannot. (OT comment: I suggest you switch from using remember to using

Re: [O] org-contacts or bbdb?

2011-10-21 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hi Wes and all, Wes Hardaker wrote: On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 10:21:11 +0800, Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net said: EA As Rasmus mentioned, if you use BBDB you should get version 3, it's EA significantly better than the previous version. There's a slow movement EA towards better

Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords

2011-10-21 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hi Eric and Torsten, Eric Schulte wrote: We could open an older file and if it isn't working, we could try #+PROPERTY: babel-function-set obsolete I think that making use of such a feature is almost as onerous as changing to the new terms (which is a simple search replace, in fact once

Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords

2011-10-21 Thread Eric Schulte
So far I have the following. code block names | source | dye | | srcname | dokos | | srcname | moe | | srcname | vauban | | srcname | wagner | | name| goaziou | call lines | call | dye | | call | dokos | | call | moe | | call | vauban | | call | wagner | | call |

Re: [O] Date-centric Clocktable

2011-10-21 Thread Bastien
Hi Rasmus, Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes: Is is possible to have a clocktabke with times in the left-most column? The people I am doing some work for now prefer it that way for unknown reasons. This is an example | date | Headline| total |

Re: [O] Exporting to Pinboard.in

2011-10-21 Thread Bastien
Hi Aditya, Aditya Mandayam adity...@gmail.com writes: Could anyone tell me how to do this? Please have a look at Wes generic exporter (in contrib/lisp/org-export-generic.el) which provides a framework for supporting new (simple) export formats. HTH, -- Bastien

Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords

2011-10-21 Thread Thomas S. Dye
Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes: t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes: [1] I have the same annoying feelings with #+SOURCE, #+SRCNAME, #+FUNCTION, #+CALL, #+LOB, and SBE, some of which are interchangeable; some not. I'd prefer

Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords

2011-10-21 Thread Eric Schulte
Just to make it as easy as possible for everyone Might it be possible to introduce a small flags like obsolete and stable (standard) Old functions, old syntax, etc., might move first to obsolete before completely removed... We could open an older file and if it isn't working, we could

Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords

2011-10-21 Thread Thorsten
Hi Eric, Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes: named code blocks [1] -- source srcname function calling external functions [2] -- call lob named data [3] -- tblname resname results data here my votes: [1] -- srcname [2] -- call [3] -- ? I would choose

Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines

2011-10-21 Thread Nick Dokos
Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com wrote: 2. Allowing you to pass multiple buffer-wide arguments with :var. This could make a substantive difference in some applications. The following will work: #+BABEL: :var euro=1.3791 :var salestax=.15 The following will not, since it

Re: [O] org-mac-protocol no remember window and Symbol's function definition is void: caddr from emacs server

2011-10-21 Thread Nick Dokos
Bastien b...@altern.org wrote: Hi David, David Abernethy david.aberne...@clear.net.nz writes: Waiting for Emacs... *ERROR*: Symbol's function definition is void: caddr That's quite weird. Can anyone spot the cause of the problem please? Sorry, I cannot. (OT comment: I

Re: [O] Include does not work when doing org-export-as-org

2011-10-21 Thread Nick Dokos
Bastien b...@altern.org wrote: Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: You are welcome - and I think it might be good in integrate Nicks function into Org and make it available through the menu or a key. Indeed -- IIRC the problem is that Nick cannot submit non-tiny

[O] Org-mode Standardized Code Block Keywords

2011-10-21 Thread chris . m . malone
I've invited you to be an owner of the Google Moderator series Org-mode Standardized Code Block Keywords. You can view and edit this series at http://www.google.com/moderator/#16/e=ffe1e

Re: [O] Org-mode Standardized Code Block Keywords

2011-10-21 Thread Chris Malone
Well…I didn't mean to invite everyone to own it, but rather to invite everyone to vote… :-p Anyway, this should be a good place to tally the votes without filling inboxes. Chris On Oct 21, 2011, at 11:30 AM, chris.m.mal...@gmail.com wrote: I've invited you to be an owner of the Google

Re: [O] Current patches to make org-mode run on XEmacs

2011-10-21 Thread Bastien
Hi Michael, thanks for these patches. Next time, could you provide one patch per mail? The patchwork server cannot handle multiple patches and it makes it easier to discuss every patch -- thanks! Some comments below. Michael Sperber sper...@deinprogramm.de writes: ... are attached. I've

Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines

2011-10-21 Thread Rainer M Krug
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.comwrote: Christian Moe m...@christianmoe.com writes: Hi again, I can quickly think of two advantages of the late lamented (if only by me) #+BABEL header over using properties. 1. Allowing you to specify multiple

Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines

2011-10-21 Thread Rainer M Krug
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 8:35 PM, Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.comwrote: Christian Moe m...@christianmoe.com writes: Hi again, I can quickly think of two advantages of the late lamented (if only by me)

Re: [O] Org-mode Standardized Code Block Keywords

2011-10-21 Thread Jambunathan K
chris.m.mal...@gmail.com writes: I've invited you to be an owner of the Google Moderator series Org-mode Standardized Code Block Keywords. You can view and edit this series at http://www.google.com/moderator/#16/e=ffe1e I generally feel sad whenever some posts a blob via imgur or pastebin. It

Re: [O] FYI: Org mode testing framework, Emacs 23 and 22

2011-10-21 Thread Bastien
Hi Eric and David, Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes: I suppose the next step here would be to talk to Bastien about setting up such a system on the org-mode server. For the record, I'm all for a server-side setup that will test latest Org on a regular basis. Jason, depending on our

Re: [O] Org-mode Standardized Code Block Keywords

2011-10-21 Thread Chris Malone
Hi Jambunathan, That is a good point, but I wanted to make the option available. Ignore the Google moderator link if you'd rather the discussion stay on the mailing list. I planned on sending the results to the mailing list, perhaps tomorrow, anyhow. Chris On Oct 21, 2011, at 11:43 AM,

[O] [babel] Globally assigning a value to a variable

2011-10-21 Thread Sebastien Vauban
#+PROPERTY: var myvar=original * Overview I would like to test a global variable assignment (just done here above) and local ones (on the code block itself). It seems that the global value is not known. Though, maybe, I don't understand it fully yet. * Test code ** Using the local var

Re: [O] FYI: Org mode testing framework, Emacs 23 and 22

2011-10-21 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hi Bastien, Bastien wrote: Hi Eric and David, Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes: I suppose the next step here would be to talk to Bastien about setting up such a system on the org-mode server. For the record, I'm all for a server-side setup that will test latest Org on a regular

Re: [O] Current patches to make org-mode run on XEmacs

2011-10-21 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hi Bastien and Michael, Bastien wrote: thanks for these patches. Next time, could you provide one patch per mail? The patchwork server cannot handle multiple patches and it makes it easier to discuss every patch -- thanks! Just updated Org, and tried to launch my XEmacs 21.5 (beta29)

Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords

2011-10-21 Thread Thomas S. Dye
Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes: I'm confused by [3] so I will say nothing for now, except to ask some questions: are we talking about what a human would use to label a piece of data for consumption by a block (including perhaps the future possibilities of lists and paragraphs that

Re: [O] [babel] Globally assigning a value to a variable

2011-10-21 Thread Nick Dokos
Sebastien Vauban wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com wrote: #+PROPERTY: var myvar=original * Overview I would like to test a global variable assignment (just done here above) and local ones (on the code block itself). It seems that the global value is not known. Though, maybe, I don't understand

Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords

2011-10-21 Thread Viktor Rosenfeld
Hi Eric, my preferences are: - source for code blocks. I think srcname looks ugly (although not as ugly as tblname). - call - data and results for, well, data and results. With the same semantics as Torsten Wagner suggested, i.e. a source block cannot change the contents of a data block.

Re: [O] [babel] Globally assigning a value to a variable

2011-10-21 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hi Nick, Nick Dokos wrote: Sebastien Vauban wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com wrote: #+PROPERTY: var myvar=original * Overview I would like to test a global variable assignment (just done here above) and local ones (on the code block itself). It seems that the global value is not known.

Re: [O] Org-mode Standardized Code Block Keywords

2011-10-21 Thread Darlan Cavalcante Moreira
With many people making suggestions and voting It can be a lot of work for someone to collect all of the votes. In fact, I was going to suggest using Doodle for this (http://www.doodle.com/), but Chris was faster with the google moderator. Anyway, if the final result is sent to the list,

Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines

2011-10-21 Thread Christian Moe
Hi, Yes, that works nicely, and should solve Rainer's problem. I haven't been able to think of anything else that can't be handled by properties. And I do think it's a good idea to winnow down the syntax a bit, even if things break. I just like to grumble. :-) Yours, Christian On 10/21/11

Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines

2011-10-21 Thread Darlan Cavalcante Moreira
It's excellent that now babel understands multiple values in the var property (I was one of the people that wanted this), but There Is One More Thing. Would it be feasible to inherit variables from parent sub-trees? Effectively, I'd like to append new values in lower level sub-trees, but AFAIK

[O] BUG: Export images to LaTeX

2011-10-21 Thread Anthony Lander
Hi List, I've run into a strange problem with the latest org pull. Exporting inlined images with the LaTeX exporter works or not depending on whether I include org-jsinfo in org-modules(!). This is with emacs -q on the 24.0.90.1 emacs recent release. Can someone please try to reproduce this

Re: [O] Current patches to make org-mode run on XEmacs

2011-10-21 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi Michael, I have checked these in, with the following exceptions: - Somewhere you have a call to `org-ref', I guess this must be `org-re' - The special hunk you are mentioning is not longer in org.el, I guess it was removed somehow in some other commit... Hope this makes XEmacs run smoothly

Re: [O] Recurring events with exceptions

2011-10-21 Thread Skip Collins
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 6:02 AM, Eric S Fraga e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk wrote: Yes, I have been informed that we are moving to Outlook/exchange in the new year, something I am dreading...  Matthieu Lemerre, on this list back in late June (Message-ID: 871uygg1fs@free.fr), posted a (partial?)